Magnitude of the Line Charge Density of a Power Line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the correct formulation of electric potential difference related to line charge density in power lines. The original poster struggled with using LaTeX for their calculations and sought assistance. A suggestion was made to use a more accurate equation, specifically dV = -E dr, instead of the one initially used. The poster later expressed gratitude for the help received and noted that they figured out the issue. The conversation highlights the importance of proper mathematical representation in understanding electrical concepts.
frankifur
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The potential difference between the surface of a 3.1 cm - diameter power line and a point 1.4 m distance is 3.9 kV.
Relevant Equations
Delta V = - E Delta r
Phi = Integral (E A) = qenc/epsilon naught
Okay so I am a little confused as to where I made a mistake. I couldn't figure out how to program Latex into this website but I attached a file with the work I did and an explanation of my thought process along the way.
 

Attachments

  • Physics Homework Help.pdf
    Physics Homework Help.pdf
    119.7 KB · Views: 135
  • Screenshot 2023-02-13 at 3.34.33 PM.png
    Screenshot 2023-02-13 at 3.34.33 PM.png
    13.2 KB · Views: 95
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

frankifur said:
I couldn't figure out how to program Latex into this website
See the "LaTeX Guide" link at the lower left of the Edit window. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and frankifur
Hello @frankifur ,
:welcome: ##\qquad## !​

frankifur said:
confused as to where I made a mistake

You want to use something better than ##\Delta V = -E\,r ##. Closer to ## dV = -E\, dr ##.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and frankifur
I figured it out, thanks for the help and I appreciate how welcoming you all have been!
 
  • Like
Likes BvU, MatinSAR and berkeman
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top