Magnitude of the Line Charge Density of a Power Line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the correct formulation of electric potential difference related to line charge density in power lines. The original poster struggled with using LaTeX for their calculations and sought assistance. A suggestion was made to use a more accurate equation, specifically dV = -E dr, instead of the one initially used. The poster later expressed gratitude for the help received and noted that they figured out the issue. The conversation highlights the importance of proper mathematical representation in understanding electrical concepts.
frankifur
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The potential difference between the surface of a 3.1 cm - diameter power line and a point 1.4 m distance is 3.9 kV.
Relevant Equations
Delta V = - E Delta r
Phi = Integral (E A) = qenc/epsilon naught
Okay so I am a little confused as to where I made a mistake. I couldn't figure out how to program Latex into this website but I attached a file with the work I did and an explanation of my thought process along the way.
 

Attachments

  • Physics Homework Help.pdf
    Physics Homework Help.pdf
    119.7 KB · Views: 136
  • Screenshot 2023-02-13 at 3.34.33 PM.png
    Screenshot 2023-02-13 at 3.34.33 PM.png
    13.2 KB · Views: 95
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

frankifur said:
I couldn't figure out how to program Latex into this website
See the "LaTeX Guide" link at the lower left of the Edit window. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and frankifur
Hello @frankifur ,
:welcome: ##\qquad## !​

frankifur said:
confused as to where I made a mistake

You want to use something better than ##\Delta V = -E\,r ##. Closer to ## dV = -E\, dr ##.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and frankifur
I figured it out, thanks for the help and I appreciate how welcoming you all have been!
 
  • Like
Likes BvU, MatinSAR and berkeman
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top