Majorana Mass Plot: Normal & Inverted Hierarchy

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Majorana Mass Plot
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Majorana mass as a function of the lightest neutrino, specifically comparing normal and inverted hierarchies. The formula derived is ##m_{\beta\beta} = 0.7m_1 + 0.25m_2 + 0.05m_3##, which highlights the contribution of the PMNS matrix elements. The conversation reveals that the phase parameter ##\delta_{CP}## plays a crucial role in the calculations, particularly in how it affects the squaring of complex numbers and the resultant mass contributions. It is concluded that in the normal hierarchy, a small negative contribution from the heavy neutrino can lead to cancellation, which does not occur in the inverted hierarchy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Majorana mass and its significance in neutrino physics
  • Familiarity with the PMNS matrix and its parameters
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their properties, particularly in squaring
  • Basic grasp of neutrino mass hierarchies: normal and inverted
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the PMNS matrix on neutrino mass calculations
  • Investigate the role of the CP-violating phase ##\delta_{CP}## in neutrino physics
  • Learn about the experimental methods for measuring Majorana mass
  • Study the differences between normal and inverted neutrino mass hierarchies
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in particle physics and neutrino research, as well as students and researchers interested in the implications of Majorana mass and neutrino hierarchies.

Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! In the attached plot, we have the Majorana mass as a function of the lightest neutrino for the normal (m1<m2<m3) and inverted (m3<m1<m2) hierarchy. Plugging in the values from the PMNS matrix in the formula for Majorana mass, I get something of the form: ##m_{\beta\beta} = 0.7m_1+0.25m_2+0.05m_3##. I am not sure I understand why do we have that downward branching for the normal hierarchy. Can someone explain it to me? Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • majorana.png
    majorana.png
    10 KB · Views: 259
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you assume for the phase and did you try varying that a bit?
 
mfb said:
What did you assume for the phase and did you try varying that a bit?
Thank you for your reply. For the angles I used the Wikipedia values. By phase I assume you mean the ##\delta_{CP}## parameter, right? If I understand it correctly, the formula for ##m_{\beta\beta}## contains only the first line of the PMNS matrix i.e. ##U_{e1}##, ##U_{e2}## and ##U_{e3}##. The phase appears only in ##U_{e3}##, but upon squaring that would cancel, wouldn't it? Is there another place where the phase appears?
 
Squaring a complex number doesn't make the phase disappear, it just doubles the phase.
##m_{\beta\beta}## is the magnitude of the total complex sum, here is the formula taking this into account. An angle between 225 and 315 degrees (and between 45 and 135 degrees) leads to a square that has a negative real component.
 
mfb said:
Squaring a complex number doesn't make the phase disappear, it just doubles the phase.
##m_{\beta\beta}## is the magnitude of the total complex sum, here is the formula taking this into account. An angle between 225 and 315 degrees (and between 45 and 135 degrees) leads to a square that has a negative real component.
Oh, I assumed that by squaring they meant ##aa^*##, now it makes more sense. So that phase leads to some sort of cancellation? It is still not clear to me why it is just in that mass range, and why it is not there at all in the inverted hierarchy case.
 
You can plug in numbers and calculate.

In the normal order a small negative contribution from the heavy neutrino can cancel the rest. In the inverted order case you have two heavy masses and don't get that cancellation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
3K