1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Making a 50 um collimated beam on a budget

  1. Jun 15, 2014 #1
    Hello again,

    My handy optics engineer has left the country leaving me with a problem that's over my head. I need a low cost (i.e. $500.00) solution to produce a circular, collimated, 405nm beam. My beam needs to be within the target diameter (+/-20%) from 0 - 4" from the output lens and have an output power of about 6.5 mW +/-2mw.

    My first thought is to take a 405nm laser with single-mode pigtail coupled into a lens tube with an aspheric lens to collimate it and a couple of plano- convex lenses to reduce the collimation to .002".
    This method is more expensive than I like, but it avoids having a pinhole / alignment fixture, which is also expensive.

    Any ideas?

    Thanks in advance,

  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 16, 2014 #2

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    It's been a while since I tried something similar, but if the laser is already fiber coupled, there should be a reasonably simple way to do this (but to be fair, your spec may be unrealistic). Maybe a ball or GRIN lens at the fiber output?
  4. Jun 16, 2014 #3
    Conceptual adjustment.

    It appears that any efforts to re-collimate down to 50um is unrealistic.

    Thus, I perceive my best option as focusing a circular image at some distance from my optics. This is unfortunate in that I'm attempting to expose 3D objects, and my current mechanical system lacks a translation axis to keep the image in focus as the object's distance varies from about 1-4 inches.

    Given the need still achieve a 100um spot with roughly 6.5mw at 405nm, do I have any suggestions on how to achieve this on a $500.00 budget and what optical configuration would be most appropriate?

    Thanks in advance,

    - Mike
  5. Jun 17, 2014 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Use a really long focal length lens; but then the focal spot will be bigger.

    Also note that the nominal focal length is usually based on green light (~530 nm); it will be in the lens specification. So you will have to recompute the focal length for the 405 nm light Be sure to buy a lens that has good transmission for that wavelength! Fused silica has higher transmission as you near the UV than does BK7; but it costs a bit more.

    Also a long focal length will increase the focal spot size, as well as the Rayleigh range. For a 2 meter focal length with UV light I got a 200 um spot size.

    PS: Why not email your former optics guy, and ask his advice?
    PPS: Or call tech sales support at one of the optics supply houses - they are very knowledgeable, and know all of the gadgets and their costs
    PPPS: And the cheapest way is to borrow the 405 nm laser ...
  6. Jul 11, 2014 #5
    I´m not a laser guy, but I do have a collimator and other laser stuff for sale. Maybe this
    collimator will help you out. Unfortunately I don´t know anything about it.
    Collimator: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hkwvox1ok71bsjf/AAAxPe-eanOPPXA53uoHd0ppa
    Other stuff: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/l71hg5ww2x55z9p/AAAtYXH3O8QEeAr1Cx0CcxGja
    I will upload pics of more gear soon.
    If there is something of interest, let me know and leave a reasonable bid.
  7. Jul 19, 2014 #6

    Claude Bile

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Provided your beam is collimated to begin with, a standard 4f lens configuration should be able to telescope the beam to whatever diameter you require, within the bounds allowed by diffraction.

    Note that the narrower you attempt to focus/collimate a spot, the more it will diffract. This is a standard trade off that has no cheap solution unfortunately.

Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook