Mandelstam Variables for 2->2 Scattering with Equal Masses in CoM Frame

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of Mandelstam variables for 2->2 scattering with equal masses in the center-of-mass (CoM) frame. Key equations derived include the momentum magnitude as ##|\vec{k}| = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{2s+t+u}## and the relationship ##t-u = 4|\vec{k}||\vec{p}|\cos\theta##. The conservation laws confirm that all four three-momenta have equal magnitudes, while the directions of incoming and outgoing momenta are opposite. The final expressions for the differential cross-section are presented in terms of Mandelstam variables, emphasizing the importance of energy and momentum conservation in these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Mandelstam variables (s, t, u)
  • Conservation laws in particle physics
  • Center-of-mass frame analysis
  • Quantum field theory basics (specifically ##\phi^3## theory)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Mandelstam variables in different scattering processes.
  • Learn about the implications of conservation laws in particle interactions.
  • Explore the application of the differential cross-section formula in various scattering scenarios.
  • Investigate the role of scattering angles in determining the outcomes of particle collisions.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in particle physics and quantum field theory, as well as students studying scattering processes and conservation laws in high-energy physics.

  • #31
I'd put ##u=4m^2-s-t##. Then the cross section depends only on ##s## and ##t##. As shown above through ##t## the expression depends on the scattering angle ##\vartheta##. Then you can check, where the expression at fixed ##s=E_{\text{cm}}^2## is maximal as a function of ##t## and thus which angles dominate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
vanhees71 said:
I'd put ##u=4m^2-s-t##. Then the cross section depends only on ##s## and ##t##. As shown above through ##t## the expression depends on the scattering angle ##\vartheta##. Then you can check, where the expression at fixed ##s=E_{\text{cm}}^2## is maximal as a function of ##t## and thus which angles dominate.

Ah! I see!

So, you suggest the following:

##\displaystyle{\frac{d\sigma}{d\theta} = \frac{|\mathcal{M}|^{2}}{64\pi^{2}E_{\text{cm}}^{2}}}##

##\displaystyle{= \frac{g^{4}}{64\pi^{2}E_{\text{cm}}^{2}}\left|\frac{i}{s-m^{2}} + \frac{i}{t-m^{2}} + \frac{i}{u-m^{2}}\right|^{2}}##

##\displaystyle{= \frac{g^{4}}{64\pi^{2}s}\left(\frac{1}{s-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{t-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{u-m^{2}}\right)^{2}}##

##\displaystyle{= \frac{g^{4}}{64\pi^{2}s}\left(\frac{1}{s-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{t-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{(4m^{2}-s-t)-m^{2}}\right)^{2}}##

##\displaystyle{= \frac{g^{4}}{64\pi^{2}s}\left(\frac{1}{s-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{t-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{3m^{2}-s-t}\right)^{2}}##

##\displaystyle{\frac{d\sigma}{d\theta} = \frac{g^{4}}{64\pi^{2}s}\left(\frac{1}{s-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{-\sqrt{s-4m^{2}}(1-\cos\theta)-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{3m^{2}-s+\sqrt{s-4m^{2}}(1-\cos\theta)}\right)^{2}}##

For ##s\gg \sqrt{m}##,

##\displaystyle{\frac{d\sigma}{d\theta} = \frac{g^{4}}{64\pi^{2}s}\left(\frac{1}{s} + \frac{1}{-\sqrt{s}(1-\cos\theta)-m^{2}} + \frac{1}{-s+\sqrt{s}(1-\cos\theta)}\right)^{2}}##

So, the differential cross-section, for a fixed ##s##, is a maximum at angles ##\theta = 2\pi n##, where ##n=0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \dots##.

What do you think?
 
  • #33
I think the square root looks wrong and the expression is dimensionally inconsistent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K