Marginal revenue as a function of *price* instead of quantity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter glass.shards
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Marginal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving revenue as a function of price for Mondo Inc.'s Caffeinator espresso machine. The linear function for quantity sold, q, is established as q = -2p + 5200, where p is the price. The total revenue function R is defined as R(p) = q(p) * p, leading to the need to substitute q(p) into this equation to find the marginal revenue, MR, with respect to price.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with revenue functions in economics
  • Knowledge of differentiation for calculating marginal revenue
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study how to derive revenue functions from demand equations
  • Learn about marginal revenue calculations in economics
  • Explore linear regression techniques for demand forecasting
  • Investigate price elasticity of demand and its impact on revenue
USEFUL FOR

Economics students, business analysts, and anyone involved in pricing strategy or revenue optimization will benefit from this discussion.

glass.shards
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Mondo Inc. estimates that it can sell 3400 of its premium espresso machine, the Caffeinator, at a price of $900 each, but it will lose 100 sales for each $50 increase in price of the machine. Let p be the price and q be the number of machines sold.
(a) Write q as a linear function of p.
(b) Write the revenue R as a function of p, and find the marginal revenue, MR, with respect to p.

Homework Equations


This is straight out of an exam so I'm guessing it's not a typo. Isn't revenue usually a function of the quantity produced, not the price? I can solve for an equation for part a), but part b) eludes me.

The Attempt at a Solution


I got q = -2p + 5200 for a), but have no idea how to do b).

Am I reading the question wrong? Any help would be very much appreciated, thanks so much in advance! =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have a direct relation between q & p, q(p) , so should first write total revenue as

R(p) = q(p).p

then substitue for q(p) in terms of p

ie because of the direct relation, you should be able to express it in terms of either, R(q) = R (p)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K