MHB Markov Process Limit: Calculating $u_k$ as a Function of $a,b$

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We consider the equation \begin{equation*}u_{k+1}=\begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 1-a & 1-b\end{pmatrix}u_k \ \text{ with } \ u_0=\begin{pmatrix}1 \\1 \end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}

For which values of $a$ and $b$ is the above equation a Markov process?
Calculate $u_k$ as a function of $a,b$.
Which conditions do $a,b$ have to satisfy so that $u_k$ approximates a finite limit as $k\rightarrow \infty$ and which is that limit? I have done the following:

So that the equation is a Markov process the element of the matrix must be non-negativ and the sum of the colums must be $1$.
So, we get $0\leq a,b\leq 1$.

\begin{align*}&u_0=\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix} \\ &u_1=\begin{pmatrix}a+b \\ 2-(a+b)\end{pmatrix} \\ &u_2=\begin{pmatrix}a^2+2b-b^2 \\ 2-(a^2+2b-b^2)\end{pmatrix}\\ &u_3=\begin{pmatrix}a^3+2ab-b^2a+2b-a^2b-2b^2+b^3 \\ 2-(a^3+2ab-b^2a+2b-a^2b-2b^2+b^3)\end{pmatrix} \\ & \ldots\end{align*}

Let $u_k=(x_k,y_k)^T$ then it holds that \begin{align*}&x_k+y_k=2 \\ & x_{k+1}=(a−b)x_k+2b \\ & x0=y0=1\end{align*}

We have that \begin{align*} x_{k+1}&=(a−b)x_k+2b \\ & =(a-b)^2x_{k-1}+2b(1-b)+2b \\ & = (a-b)^3x_{k-2}+2b(a-b)^2+2b(a-b)+2b \\ & =\ldots \\ & = (a-b)^{k+1}x_0+2b\left (\sum_{i=0}^k(a-b)^i\right )\end{align*}

Therefore, we get \begin{equation*}u_k=\begin{pmatrix}x_k \\ y_k\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}(a-b)^{k+1}x_0+2b\left (\sum_{i=0}^k(a-b)^i\right )\\ 2-(a-b)^{k+1}x_0+2b\left (\sum_{i=0}^k(a-b)^i\right )\end{pmatrix} \end{equation*}

So that $u_k$ approximates a finite limit as $k\rightarrow \infty$ it must be $0<a-b<1$.

Is everything correct? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

We consider the equation \begin{equation*}u_{k+1}=\begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 1-a & 1-b\end{pmatrix}u_k \ \text{ with } \ u_0=\begin{pmatrix}1 \\1 \end{pmatrix}\end{equation*}

For which values of $a$ and $b$ is the above equation a Markov process?
Calculate $u_k$ as a function of $a,b$.
Which conditions do $a,b$ have to satisfy so that $u_k$ approximates a finite limit as $k\rightarrow \infty$ and which is that limit?

let's call your transition matrix

$P := \begin{pmatrix}a & b \\ 1-a & 1-b\end{pmatrix}$

it's customary in probability theory to make $P$ row stochastics (rows sum to one, nonnegative entries) not column stochastic, but in principle there's no issue with being column stochastic. You've stated the conditions for being column stochastic just fine. Note with $\mathbf 1$ the ones vector (which $\mathbf u_0$ is for some reason), being column stochastic means

$\mathbf 1^T P = \mathbf 1^T$
or
$P^T \mathbf 1 = \mathbf 1$

so the ones vector is a (left) eigenvector with eigenvalue of 1.

We'll call the eigenvalue $\lambda_1 = 1$, which is of course an eigenvalue of $P$ and $P^T$
mathmari said:
... Therefore, we get \begin{equation*}u_k=\begin{pmatrix}x_k \\ y_k\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}(a-b)^{k+1}x_0+2b\left (\sum_{i=0}^k(a-b)^i\right )\\ 2-(a-b)^{k+1}x_0+2b\left (\sum_{i=0}^k(a-b)^i\right )\end{pmatrix} \end{equation*}

So that $u_k$ approximates a finite limit as $k\rightarrow \infty$ it must be $0<a-b<1$.

Is everything correct? (Wondering)

I appreciate all the work, but the conclusion doesn't follow. I see no problem with e.g. $b= 0.7$ and $a = 0.2$, you'll still get a valid limit.

A much simpler approach is to make use of trace, so

$\text{tr} \big(P\big) = a + 1-b = \lambda_1 + \lambda_2 = 1 +\lambda_2$

so
$a -b = \lambda_2$

if $\big \vert \lambda_2 \big \vert \lt 1$, then you must get a finite limit (why?). You should be able to find the single (right) eigenvector in the nullspace of $\big(P-I\big)$ and from here figure out the limiting value of $\mathbf u_k$.

If $\lambda_2 = -1$ you have periodic behavior (period of 2) and no limit can exist; in this case the matrix is a pairwise swap permutation matrix. The special case of $\lambda_2 = 1$ remains to be considered and you can check that this implies $P$ is the identity matrix, which is no problem for limits...
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top