- #1

- 3

- 0

What's got me on the fence are the atoms' momentums: it's a property of the present state (at time t, the momentum is p), but its value depends on past states. So does anyone know if a system like this could have the markov property?

Thanks

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter lolcopters
- Start date

- #1

- 3

- 0

What's got me on the fence are the atoms' momentums: it's a property of the present state (at time t, the momentum is p), but its value depends on past states. So does anyone know if a system like this could have the markov property?

Thanks

- #2

DrClaude

Mentor

- 7,575

- 3,925

You misunderstood what Markov is about. Of course, the state of any system at time t_{0} depends on what happened at times t < t_{0}. But in a Markovian process, there is no memory of how the state at time t_{0} was reached. All that is important is that the state at time t_{0} completely describes the system (and its future evolution).

In the case of two atoms governed by a known Hamiltonian, given the wave function ψ(t_{0}) of the two-atom system, one can calculate ψ(t) for any t > t_{0}. No need to know the wave function for any time < t_{0}.

In the case of two atoms governed by a known Hamiltonian, given the wave function ψ(t

Last edited:

- #3

Stephen Tashi

Science Advisor

- 7,639

- 1,493

Say I'm simulating the movements of two interacting atoms. Could this system have the markov property (the future positions of the atoms depend only on the current position, not the past)?

It isn't meaningful to ask whether a physical system has the markov property until you say what variables you will choose to define a "state". A physical system may have the markov property when one definition of "state" is used and not have it when a different definition is used.

Are you considering actual atoms - or just thinking about "point particles" ?

You only mention "position" as the variables involved in your definition "state" ? Did you intend to omit variables like mass, velocity and acceleration ?

Share: