Markov property: compatible with momentum?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lolcopters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Property
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
lolcopters
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Say I'm simulating the movements of two interacting atoms. Could this system have the markov property (the future positions of the atoms depend only on the current position, not the past)?
What's got me on the fence are the atoms' momentums: it's a property of the present state (at time t, the momentum is p), but its value depends on past states. So does anyone know if a system like this could have the markov property?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You misunderstood what Markov is about. Of course, the state of any system at time t0 depends on what happened at times t < t0. But in a Markovian process, there is no memory of how the state at time t0 was reached. All that is important is that the state at time t0 completely describes the system (and its future evolution).

In the case of two atoms governed by a known Hamiltonian, given the wave function ψ(t0) of the two-atom system, one can calculate ψ(t) for any t > t0. No need to know the wave function for any time < t0.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lolcopters
lolcopters said:
Say I'm simulating the movements of two interacting atoms. Could this system have the markov property (the future positions of the atoms depend only on the current position, not the past)?

It isn't meaningful to ask whether a physical system has the markov property until you say what variables you will choose to define a "state". A physical system may have the markov property when one definition of "state" is used and not have it when a different definition is used.

Are you considering actual atoms - or just thinking about "point particles" ?

You only mention "position" as the variables involved in your definition "state" ? Did you intend to omit variables like mass, velocity and acceleration ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrewD