MHB Mass 50kg Box Slows to Halt on Friction: 14.5m Distance

AI Thread Summary
A 50 kg box slows from 10 m/s on rough ground with a friction coefficient of 0.3 and an initial tension of 25N. The box travels a total distance of 14.5m before stopping due to friction alone after the string breaks. Calculations show that the box traveled 13m before the string broke, with the applied force acting in the same direction as friction. The problem is noted as poorly worded, leading to confusion in the calculations. The final distance traveled before the string broke is confirmed to be 13m.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A box of mass 50 kg is slowing down from 10 m/s on a rough horizontal ground. The coefficient of friction between the box and the ground is 0.3. To start with, the box is being slowed by a string providing a tension of 25N horizontally. Then the string breaks and the box comes to a halt under friction alone after a total distance of 14.5m. Find how far the box traveled before the string broke.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
show your work on this problem, please
 
skeeter said:
show your work on this problem, please
I don't understand how to approach this problem.
m=50kg, it says slowing down from 10m/s, so it's decelerating, u=10m/s
Using F=m×a, 25-(0.3×500)=50a, a=-2.5m/s^2. By taking the total distance traveled under friction, I get v=5.24m/s, so making the assumption that the box comes to halt instantly, I got s= 1.05m when subtracted from total distance I get 13.5 m but the ans is 13m
 
To get 13m as the solution, the 25N applied force acts in the same direction as the friction force before the string breaks.

$v_f^2 = 10^2 - 2(3.5) \cdot \Delta x_1 \implies v_f^2 = 100 - 7\Delta x_1$

after the string breaks ...

$0^2 = (100 - 7\Delta x_1) - 2(3) \cdot \Delta x_2$

$\Delta x_2 = 14.5 - \Delta x_1 \implies 100 - 7\Delta x_1 = 6(14.5 - \Delta x_1) \implies \Delta x_1 = 13 \, m$

poorly worded problem. imho.
 
skeeter said:
To get 13m as the solution, the 25N applied force acts in the same direction as the friction force before the string breaks.

$v_f^2 = 10^2 - 2(3.5) \cdot \Delta x_1 \implies v_f^2 = 100 - 7\Delta x_1$

after the string breaks ...

$0^2 = (100 - 7\Delta x_1) - 2(3) \cdot \Delta x_2$

$\Delta x_2 = 14.5 - \Delta x_1 \implies 100 - 7\Delta x_1 = 6(14.5 - \Delta x_1) \implies \Delta x_1 = 13 \, m$

poorly worded problem. imho.
Thank you so so much!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top