Massive blast in Beirut, Lebanon

  • Thread starter Thread starter davenn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The massive explosion in Beirut, Lebanon, resulted from the detonation of approximately 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate stored in a warehouse at the port. This incident, reminiscent of the Texas City disaster of 1947, highlights severe lapses in safety protocols regarding hazardous materials. Initial reports suggest that a fire ignited by welding activities triggered the explosion, which was detected seismically as far away as Cyprus. The aftermath has left significant destruction, with estimates indicating that 300,000 people have lost their homes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ammonium nitrate properties and hazards
  • Knowledge of industrial safety regulations and storage practices
  • Familiarity with historical industrial disasters, such as the Texas City disaster
  • Basic concepts of seismic detection and measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the chemical properties and risks associated with ammonium nitrate
  • Study industrial safety regulations for hazardous materials storage
  • Examine historical case studies of industrial explosions and their causes
  • Learn about seismic detection technology and its applications in monitoring explosions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for safety engineers, emergency response teams, urban planners, and anyone involved in hazardous materials management or disaster response planning.

davenn
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
11,716


Apparently a a large chemical / nitrate storage area
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto and Drakkith
Physics news on Phys.org
davenn said:
Apparently a a large chemical / nitrate storage area
Some updates are saying now that it was explosive materials taken from a ship a couple years ago and stored in the port. Not sure how well this has been vetted so far...

https://www.cnn.com/middleeast/live...s-dle-intl/h_e6713bdae252e2feee83a4e3263c09ac

1596577164017.png
 
It looked like an ammo dump going up. The explosion occurred in warehouse where a large amount (estimated 2,750 tons) of ammonium nitrate was stored. Nobody in their right mind stores that amount of ammonium nitrate in one place, and not in a populated area. Remember Texas City, April 16, 1947.

A mid-morning fire started on board the French-registered vessel SS Grandcamp (docked in the port), and detonated her cargo of about 2,200 tons (about 1,996 metric tons) of ammonium nitrate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_disaster
Beirut had more than the Grandcamp.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, Klystron, berkeman and 3 others
Wow. What an absolutely massive blast. You can literally see buildings, cars, etc just evaporating as the shockwave hits them...

My heart goes out to the people of Beirut.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Beirut shockwave videos

 
Astronuc said:
It looked like an ammo dump going up. The explosion occurred in warehouse where a large amount (estimated 2,750 tons) of ammonium nitrate was stored. Nobody in their right mind stores that amount of ammonium nitrate in one place, and not in a populated area. Remember Texas City, April 16, 1947.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_disaster
Beirut had more than the Grandcamp.

If the ammonium nitrate wasn't stacked all in one pile, some of it can just be blown away by the explosion and not participate in it. Maybe that's why there seem to have been less victims that in the Texas City disaster.

Metal impurities like copper can make NH4NO3 more shock-sensitive by forming coordination compounds with it (http://www.wydawnictwa.ipo.waw.pl/cejem/Vol-14-Number-1-2017/Kunzel.pdf).
 
Multiple views
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, Klystron and davenn
The loss of life and the huge number of injuries is tragic and it's really sad to see a city destroyed like this, having done so well to recover after civil war

BUT leaving that aside and looking at it coldly, these videos are spectacular. The way you see the blast wave coming and then, in nearly all of them, you hear it as it clatters the photographer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
  • #10
rsk said:
BUT leaving that aside and looking at it coldly, these videos are spectacular. The way you see the blast wave coming and then, in nearly all of them, you hear it as it clatters the photographer.

Nuclear test videos have less actual harm involved. Impressive as an example of what people are able to produce.

 
  • #11
hilbert2 said:
Maybe that's why there seem to have been less victims that in the Texas City disaster.

More likely it's because the population density in Beirut is 60x higher.
 
  • #12
If interested in the root cause, Google MV Rhosus.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook, hutchphd, hilbert2 and 2 others
  • #13
@davenn I'm curious if the explosion showed up on your seismic detector.
 
  • #14
Here's a before and after.

beruit_harbor_before_and_after.jpg
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
  • #15
Borg said:
Here's a before and after.
In looking at the two pictures, at first I was thinking, "No, that looks to be a different part of the port. The shape of the water inlet looks different." And then I realized that it's because of the giant hole in the ground from the explosion that is now filled with water. Yikes!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913, Klystron and Drakkith
  • #16
Vanadium 50 said:
More likely it's because the population density in Beirut is 60x higher.

Not sure what you mean, seems to me like the higher population density should lead to more casualties, not less.

Unless somehow the high density population was more distant from the blast itself.
 
  • #17
I had the sign backwards.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borek
  • #18
Borg said:
@davenn I'm curious if the explosion showed up on your seismic detector.
It was definitely detected seismically in Cyprus


That's a great twitter account to follow if seismic rumblings are your thing.
 
  • #19
This CNN article has some well done before and after comparisons.
Screen Shot 2020-08-05 at 1.49.27 PM.png
 
  • #20
Here's an update to my previous one. According to CNN, that's a 400 foot diameter crater.

Beirut_before_and_after.jpg
 
  • Wow
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: davenn, Evo and nsaspook
  • #21
Borg said:
Here's an update to my previous one. According to CNN, that's a 400 foot diameter crater.

View attachment 267332
Shocking and upsetting due to the number of dead and injured. What first building was on fire and why did it start? Were the chemicals that exploded in the 2nd building?
 
  • #22
Evo said:
What first building was on fire and why did it start?

The belief it was welding that started a fire, which caused explosion #1 which caused explosion #2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo
  • #23
From 6 December 1917,
SS Mont-Blanc, a French cargo ship laden with high explosives, collided with the Norwegian vessel SS Imo in the Narrows, a strait connecting the upper Halifax Harbour to Bedford Basin. A fire on board the French ship ignited her cargo, causing a massive explosion that devastated the Richmond district of Halifax. Approximately 2,000 people were killed by the blast, debris, fires, or collapsed buildings, and an estimated 9,000 others were injured. The blast was the largest man-made explosion at the time, releasing the equivalent energy of roughly 2.9 kilotons of TNT (12,000 GJ).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Explosion The Halifax explosion predated the Texas City explosion by 30 years.

The Beirut explosion is about 2.7 kT of ammonium nitrate, which should not have been stored altogether, precisely because we know what happens when it goes up like Halifax or Texas City.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Lnewqban
  • #24
Borg said:
@davenn I'm curious if the explosion showed up on your seismic detector.

too small and too far

I heard on TV news last nite a guy in Turkey ( from memory) recorded it as ~ M 3.3 - 3.5
Typically a M3.5 would be recorded out to about 300 kmD
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #25
Astronuc said:
which should not have been stored altogether
People seem to like storing stuff altogether, even when they know it is unsafe, until disaster strikes, and then in hindsight...

Some fingers are starting to point to lay, or deflect blame, and I wonder if Lebanon is any different than any other place.

I remember the tire dump fire in Quebec a few years ago, as always, affecting people in the thousands.
It burned for some days billowing black smoke.
A few explosions from fuel storage tanks also mixed into the pile.
A crane had been used to pile tires to an estimated height of 13 m at the east end of the pile, nearest the stream. Beyond the reach of the crane, however, the average height of the tire pile was only about 3.5 m. In total, the pile covered an area of 31,000 m2 to an average depth of 3.5 m, with a mound approximately 13 m high stretching for about 20 m at one end. It is very difficult to estimate the number of tires contained in the pile, given that large truck tires were mixed with smaller automobile tires. It may be more accurate to characterize the size of the fuel load by the overall volume of the pile, rather than the number of tires. In this case, the total volume of tires is estimated to have been about 125,000 m3.
Now everyone knows how difficult it is to put a tire fire out, but, I guess, since no incident had ever happened there, yet, the site was allowed to keep adding to the pile of used tires.

The site is gone now, some tires I suppose being made into matts or whatever, but where they all went I do not know.
--------------
A ton of ammonium nitrate bags, rather than granular, would pack on a skid around 4 x 4 x 4 feet high if I recall. 16 square feet of floor space per ton. ( or 8 square feet per 2 ton if double stacked )

2700 tons double stack would be 21600 sq feet (2700 x 8 ) of floor space, or 1350 double stacked skids
A trailer can take 26 skids of those double stacks.
that would be 52 trailer loads to move it out somewhere, not that much of a daunting task.

In retrospect, if the transportation costs were to be $5000/trailer - $260,000 to move it out from a population concentrated area for dispersal...Other costs would accrue, how much for the actual dispersal ??

IMO, it seems to be a the bureaucratic machine at its finest. ( an oxymoron if anyone needs explanation ).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
  • #26
256bits said:
People seem to like storing stuff altogether, even when they know it is unsafe, until disaster strikes, and then in hindsight...

Well, it's not like they said "hey, let's leave this for six years". It's a few more months, a few more months...

Also, identifying the responsible party is not-trivial. Just as an example, the ship was Moldovian-flagged. Moldova is landlocked.

Finally, Lebanon's government is not the world's most functional. It's not Somalia or South Sudan, but neither is it Canada.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook and 256bits
  • #27
Vanadium 50 said:
Moldova is landlocked.
It does have a port on the Danube which is accessible to seagoing vessels.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_of_Giurgiulești

The Port of Giurgiulești was built as result of a 2005 territorial exchange with Ukraine, where Moldova received a 600 m-long bank of the Danube River (which is an international waterway).
 
  • #28
256bits said:
2700 tons double stack would be 21600 sq feet (2700 x 8 ) of floor space, or 1350 double stacked skids
A trailer can take 26 skids of those double stacks.
I've seen one undated picture that shows 1000 kg bags stored haphazardly, two-bags high and apparently side-by-side. It was a disaster waiting to happen.
https://news.yahoo.com/satellite-imagery-shows-scale-destruction-193200562.html

The bags are labeled Nitroprill, which seems to be a copy of Nitropril™ by Orica Mining Services. Prills are small porous spherical particles.
https://www.dynonobel.com/~/media/F...gen Products/1Ammonium_Nitrate_Industrial.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
  • #29
jtbell said:
It does have a port on the Danube which is accessible to seagoing vessels.

Interesting. But that makes it more landlocked than Switzerland, which has the Rhone. The real point, though, is that Moldova is a flag of convenience, and a vessel that they were willing to certify as sound and seaworthy ended up needing to stop in Beirut, where officials said in effect "that rustbucket isn't going anywhere".

The owner at the time appeared to be a Russian living in Cyprus, using a Moldovian-flagged vessel to move ammonium nitrate from Georgia to Mozambique. Could things possibly get any sketchier?
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook
  • #30
Based on the delay, This couple was less than 2,000 feet from the blast.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg and 256bits

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K