Master Holder's Inequality with Expertly Guided Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cairo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving Hölder's Inequality, specifically for sequences in the spaces \( l_p \) and \( l_q \). The participants clarify that if \( a \in l_p \) and \( b \in l_q \), then the series \( S(a,b) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n b_n \) converges absolutely and is bounded above by \( \left( \sum_{n=1}^\infty |a_n|^p \right)^{1/p} \left( \sum_{n=1}^\infty |b_n|^q \right)^{1/q} \). The discussion also emphasizes the importance of the condition \( \sum_{n=0}^\infty |a_n|^p < \infty \) for establishing absolute convergence, and addresses the relationship between finite and infinite sums in the context of the inequality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hölder's Inequality and its applications
  • Familiarity with sequence spaces \( l_p \) and \( l_q \)
  • Knowledge of convergence criteria for series
  • Basic principles of mathematical proofs and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Hölder's Inequality in detail
  • Explore the properties of sequence spaces \( l_p \) and \( l_q \)
  • Learn about the Monotone Convergence Theorem (MCT) and its applications
  • Investigate various forms of Hölder's Inequality and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in functional analysis and inequalities will benefit from this discussion.

Cairo
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I'm currently reading a book and stuck on an exercise with no solutions.

A proof would be great.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Cairo said:
I'm currently reading a book and stuck on an exercise with no solutions.

A proof would be great.

I have a bit of an interest in Holders inequality, so I'm going to make the effort to convert your word docoument into something readable for the forums. In general, posting a word document is not adequate for readers. I have also converted an "a" to a "b" in the last formula.

The problem is:

Let 1 &lt; p &lt; \infty and 1/p + 1/q = 1

Show that if a \in l_p and b \in l_q then the series
S(a,b) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n b_n
converges absolutely, and is bounded above by
\left( \sum_{n=1}^\infty\left| a_n \right|^p \right)^{1/p}<br /> \left( \sum_{n=1}^\infty\left| b_n \right|^q \right)^{1/q}

My question. What does lp mean?
 
Lp = {a = a(n) | Sigma |a(n)|^p < infinity}.

Thanks in advance.
 
Cairo said:
Lp = {a = a(n) | Sigma |a(n)|^p < infinity}.

Thanks in advance.

Define
\begin{align*}<br /> X &amp; = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left| a_n \right| ^p \\<br /> Y &amp; = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left| b_n \right| ^q \\<br /> x_n &amp; = | a_n | / X^{1/p} \\<br /> y_n &amp; = | b_n | / Y^{1/q} \\<br /> \intertext{Hence}<br /> \sum_{n=0}^\infty x_n^p &amp; = \frac{\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left| a_n \right|^p}{X} &amp; = 1 \\<br /> \sum_{n=0}^\infty y_n^q &amp; = \frac{\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left| b_n \right|^q}{Y} &amp; = 1<br /> \end{align*}​

I will also use Young's inequality. Given 1/p + 1/q = 1, for p,q > 0, a,b >= 0, we have
ab \leq \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^q}{q}​

Hence
\begin{align*}<br /> \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n b_n &amp; \leq X^{1/p}Y^{1/q} \sum_{n=0}^\infty x_n y_n \\<br /> &amp; \leq X^{1/p}Y^{1/q} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \left( \frac{x_n^p}{p} + \frac{y_n^q}{q} \right) \\<br /> &amp; \leq \frac{X^{1/p}Y^{1/q}}{p} \sum_{n=0}^\infty x_n^p + \frac{X^{1/p}Y^{1/q}}{q} \sum_{n=0}^\infty y_n^q \\<br /> &amp; = \frac{X^{1/p}Y^{1/q}}{p} + \frac{X^{1/p}Y^{1/q}}{q} \\<br /> &amp; = X^{1/p}Y^{1/q} \left( \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} \right) \\<br /> &amp; = X^{1/p}Y^{1/q}<br /> \end{align*}​
as required.

Felicitations -- sylas
 
Thanks Sylas. I can see from the proof that the series is bounded above. But where does the absolute convergence come in?

Would you have to use the MCT?

Also, do I not need to consider finite sums for Holder's Inequality?
 
Last edited:
Cairo said:
Thanks Sylas. I can see from the proof that the series is bounded above. But where does the absolute convergence come in?

I am not sure what you mean. The given condition
\sum_{n=0}^\infty |a_n|^p &lt; \infty​
is simply saying that the sum is finite. So it has a finite value, and I give it a name, X.

Also, do I not need to consider finite sums for Holder's Inequality?

There are many forms of Holder's inequality. I gave the proof for the case you presented. A finite sum follows directly as a special case of the infinite sum, where all but an infinite number of the terms are zero.

And by the way, I see you started all series at n=1, whereas I started at n=0. There's no difference; it is still just an infinite series.

Cheers -- sylas
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K