MHB Mastering Factoring Polynomials: Solving Challenging Equations with Confidence

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaMathPerson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factors Resolution
NotaMathPerson
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
After successfully solving tons of problems about factoring polynomials I've buit up quite a confidence in myself. But it did not last long when I stumbled upon these problems

Factor
$3x^3-13x^2+23x-21$
$ 6x^3-2x^2-13x-6$

None of the techniques I knew were able to help me solve these problems. Kindly assist me in this matter. Thanks much!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, NotaMathPerson! (Wave)

Let's walk through the first expression, and then you can try the second. Let's let:

$$f(x)=3x^3-13x^2+23x-21$$

Using the Rational Root Theorem, by trial and error, we find:

$$f\left(\frac{7}{3}\right)=0$$

So, using synthetic division, we find:

$$\begin{array}{c|rr}& 3 & -13 & 23 & -21 \\ \frac{7}{3} & & 7 & -14 & 21 \\ \hline & 3 & -6 & 9 & 0 \end{array}$$

So, we may now state:

$$f(x)=3x^3-13x^2+23x-21=\left(x-\frac{7}{3}\right)\left(3x^2-6x+9\right)=(3x-7)\left(x^2-2x+3\right)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
35K
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
4K
2
Replies
93
Views
14K
2
Replies
61
Views
11K
Back
Top