What Material Is Best for a 2740 mm Shaft Transmitting 2100 kNm at 40 RPM?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shams alam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material Shaft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on selecting an appropriate material for a 2740 mm shaft transmitting 2100 kNm at 40 RPM. Key considerations include calculating torsional and bending stresses, determining the maximum stress induced, and applying a factor of safety (FoS) based on the application. The importance of fatigue calculations in the design process is emphasized, as well as the need to account for the shaft's support and bearing locations, which significantly influence the bending moment analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torsional and bending stress calculations
  • Knowledge of material properties and allowable shear stress
  • Familiarity with factor of safety (FoS) concepts
  • Basic principles of rotordynamics and fatigue analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research material selection criteria for mechanical shafts
  • Learn about fatigue analysis in rotating machinery
  • Study the effects of bearing support on shaft design
  • Explore advanced stress analysis techniques for shafts
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, materials scientists, and students involved in shaft design and analysis, particularly those focusing on torque transmission and fatigue considerations in rotating systems.

shams alam
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I want to find out suitable material with it physical properties, like allowible shear stress, which will be suitable for the shaft with following given data.
R.P.M = 40 rpm
Transmitting torque = 2100 kNm
Length of the shaft = 2740 mm
Smooth drive.
Neglecting the bending movement of the shaft.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Selecting the material requires knowledge of the stresses, and no one can know those stresses without doing the analysis on the particular shaft geometry. You need all the loads (not just torque) in addition to all the geometry.
 
shams alam said:
I want to find out suitable material with it physical properties, like allowible shear stress, which will be suitable for the shaft with following given data.
R.P.M = 40 rpm
Transmitting torque = 2100 kNm
Length of the shaft = 2740 mm
Smooth drive.
Neglecting the bending movement of the shaft.

2100kNm & shaft length of over 2m, neglecting Bending Moment would be stupid.

Start finding all the stresses, eg, torsional stress & bending stress, calculate the maximum stress induced, assume an appropriate factor of safety depending upon the application, get the minimum strength required using FoS * Stress induced, select a material.
 
ank_gl said:
2100kNm & shaft length of over 2m, neglecting Bending Moment would be stupid.

Start finding all the stresses, eg, torsional stress & bending stress, calculate the maximum stress induced, assume an appropriate factor of safety depending upon the application, get the minimum strength required using FoS * Stress induced, select a material.
That's pretty good ank_gl, and it's not incorrect. But don't forget that a shaft is typically subject to fatigue, and it's typically the fatigue calculation that governs the final design.
 
ank_gl said:
2100kNm & shaft length of over 2m, neglecting Bending Moment would be stupid.
Not necessarily. The OP hasn't mentioned anything about how the shaft is supported, i.e. the locations/spacing of the bearing surfaces. That is going to be the biggest factor in the real design in that the rotordynamics will dictate whether the bending moment argument is valid or not.
 
That's pretty good ank_gl, and it's not incorrect. But don't forget that a shaft is typically subject to fatigue, and it's typically the fatigue calculation that governs the final design.

yes right, but I meant that FoS should take care of all those things.

Not necessarily. The OP hasn't mentioned anything about how the shaft is supported, i.e. the locations/spacing of the bearing surfaces. That is going to be the biggest factor in the real design in that the rotordynamics will dictate whether the bending moment argument is valid or not.

oops!:redface: forgot that part altogether about BM
 
ank_gl said:
2100kNm & shaft length of over 2m, neglecting Bending Moment would be stupid.

and so is neglecting friction and aero drag in dynamics problems, but when you're a student you have to start somewhere. basically, I am assuming the OP is a student, since the question has that school-ness ring to it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
26K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
18K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K