[Material Science] Metal foam sandwich to prevent buckling?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a metal foam sandwich structure, specifically maraging steel, to prevent buckling in a spherical design subjected to high external pressure (10 MPa). Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of material properties, structural integrity, and alternative designs in the context of material science and engineering applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the current state of technology regarding maraging steel foam sandwiches, asking if it is emerging or purely speculative.
  • Concerns are raised about the mass-specific yield strength and Young's modulus of the foam compared to solid steel, with requests for estimates on how much weaker the foam might be.
  • Another participant suggests that a single-layer structure with ribs could suffice, emphasizing the importance of ballast placement for achieving neutral buoyancy in a high-pressure environment.
  • There is a discussion about the necessary wall thickness for a sphere to maintain neutral buoyancy, with calculations provided for a specific density scenario.
  • One participant proposes the idea of using a double wall sphere with a geodesic net of ribs filled with heavy materials to reduce wall thickness while maintaining structural integrity.
  • Questions arise regarding the nature of the external medium, with suggestions that it could be highly compressed carbon dioxide, leading to further discussion on its density characteristics at the specified pressure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the design requirements and material properties, with no consensus reached on the feasibility of the proposed foam sandwich structure or the best approach to prevent buckling.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about material properties and environmental conditions, which may not be universally applicable. The calculations provided rely on specific density values and structural considerations that may vary in practical applications.

Pds3.14
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
Let's assume for a minute that money was of no concern. If one has a 10 MPa external environment and needs to have vacuumed-out spheres (or 1 atmosphere, close enough to call vacuum) inside of that environment.

In particular, I was thinking of a sandwiched lattice of maraging steel, with it's conveniently high 2.6 GPa yield strength as a solid sheet, but its shockingly typical 210 GPa Young's modulus, also as a solid sheet.

The problem is that the wall thickness necessary to make it survive the compressive load is very thin. A sphere a meter in radius need only have something like a 2 mm thick wall to support itself against the intense pressure, as 2.6e9 pascals * 0.002 m * 2 * pi * 1 m / (pi*(1 m)^2)=10.4 MPa. but the wall thickness necessary to prevent it from buckling, given for an (extremely optimistic) ideal spherical object by: 2.1e11 pascals * 2 * 0.002^2 / sqrt(3*(1-0.26^2)) = 1.005 MPa.

So of course, looking at the formula for stiffness, I thought "what if I could make it thicker but keep the same mass of it in order to increase the stiffness independently of the mass?" I.E. I want Pterosaur bones made of rocket-grade steel.

So I suppose my questions are:

#1. Is making a maraging steel (or similar material) foam sandwich within the current state of the art? Is it emerging technology? Is it something speculatively possible in the relatively near future? Or is it totally fanciful magitech?

#2. Would the mass-specific yield strength match that of solid steel? If not, how much weaker would it be for the foam?

#3 Would the mass-specific young's modulus match that of solid steel? If not, how much weaker would it be for the foam?

#4. If it isn't possible or it wouldn't be useful, what are some other ways of preventing a sphere or a tube from buckling without putting cross-bracings all the way through the middle? (stuff belongs in the middle).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is no requirement that there be two layers. You only need ribs cast onto the steel.

The problem is actually related to the application.

If the external pressure is 10MPa, then I guess it is effectively “underwater” and so it will have buoyancy due to the spherical volume. The best place to put the required ballast is probably in the pressure hull. In order to be neutrally buoyant with an external fluid density of 1.0 and a wall density of say 8.1 your wall thickness will need to be a significant portion of the sphere radius. For wall density = 8.1, in water, the wall thickness, if my quick maths is correct r = R * cuberoot(1 – 1/density)?, will be 4.3% of the outer radius. A 1 metre diameter sphere will need a 23 mm wall.

If you need to maintain neutral buoyancy with a thinner wall then you may need to consider a double wall sphere with a cast geodesic net of perforated ribs. Fill the spaces between the ribs with Pb (s.g.=11.3) or Hg (s.g.=13.5). Neither of those ballast elements will halve the solid wall thickness. You will have to watch out for the thermal expansion coefficients.
 
Baluncore said:
There is no requirement that there be two layers. You only need ribs cast onto the steel.

The problem is actually related to the application.

If the external pressure is 10MPa, then I guess it is effectively “underwater” and so it will have buoyancy due to the spherical volume. The best place to put the required ballast is probably in the pressure hull. In order to be neutrally buoyant with an external fluid density of 1.0 and a wall density of say 8.1 your wall thickness will need to be a significant portion of the sphere radius. For wall density = 8.1, in water, the wall thickness, if my quick maths is correct r = R * cuberoot(1 – 1/density)?, will be 4.3% of the outer radius. A 1 metre diameter sphere will need a 23 mm wall.

If you need to maintain neutral buoyancy with a thinner wall then you may need to consider a double wall sphere with a cast geodesic net of perforated ribs. Fill the spaces between the ribs with Pb (s.g.=11.3) or Hg (s.g.=13.5). Neither of those ballast elements will halve the solid wall thickness. You will have to watch out for the thermal expansion coefficients.
It would be under high pressure, but buoyancy would be largely irrelevant, as the density of the external medium would not be water-like. The stuff inside the sphere would sufficiently weigh it down.
 
Pds3.14 said:
the external medium would not be water-like.
What material might that be ?
 
Baluncore said:
What material might that be ?
Highly compressed Carbon Dioxide
 
Interesting, at 10MPa I would expect CO2 to be liquid with a temperature dependent density somewhere between 0.5 and 1.5, comparable to water.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K