Math student want to study physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for physics books suitable for a PhD student in abstract algebra who is interested in self-studying physics. Participants explore the challenges faced by mathematicians when transitioning to physics and share various resources and opinions on specific texts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests Spivak's "Physics for Mathematicians" as a suitable resource, noting its rigorous approach that may appeal to mathematicians.
  • Another participant highlights the difficulty mathematicians may have in accepting physical concepts that lack rigorous proof, asking for examples to illustrate this challenge.
  • A different participant expresses strong disapproval of Spivak's book, describing it as awkward and disappointing, while asserting that there are better physics books available.
  • A participant provides a link to a general guide for physics resources, suggesting it as an alternative for those seeking recommendations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the value of Spivak's physics book, with some participants recommending it while others strongly advise against it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which resources are most suitable for the original poster's needs.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not established a consensus on the best approach for mathematicians learning physics, nor have they provided specific examples to clarify the challenges mentioned.

kahlid
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am a PhD student majoring in abstract algebra and I want to learn physics_self-study_, what books do you recommend ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kahlid said:
Hi,

I am a PhD student majoring in abstract algebra and I want to learn physics_self-study_, what books do you recommend ?

What physics do you already know and what do you want to know?
 
Depending on how much you suffer from mathematician's brain, you might like Spivak's Physics for Mathematicians. The notes the book developed from are here.

The problem with learning physics for a mathematician is that it's very hard to get comfortable with believing things just because they seem to work. No proof is needed, because if it works that is the proof. But Spivak gets rigorous in a way only a mathematician can enjoy.
 
IGU said:
The problem with learning physics for a mathematician is that it's very hard to get comfortable with believing things just because they seem to work. No proof is needed, because if it works that is the proof.
Can you, please, provide some examples.
 
I highly recommend against Spivak's physics book. The book is very awkward and disappointing. There are many good physics books out there, but Spivak is definitely not one of them.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K