Math textbooks for physics grad student and other questions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the need for mathematical preparation for a master's degree in theoretical physics, specifically focusing on linear algebra and its applications. Participants share recommendations for textbooks and resources to strengthen mathematical skills, particularly in linear algebra and group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to improve their math skills, particularly in linear algebra, before starting a master's program in theoretical physics.
  • The same participant mentions familiarity with basic concepts in linear algebra but seeks deeper understanding and mathematical proofs.
  • Recommendations for textbooks include Anton, Strang, Lang, and Axler, though the participant notes constraints of time and budget.
  • Another participant suggests that linearity is crucial in physics and shares their own experience with Strang's book and other resources like Don Koks' "Explorations in Mathematical Physics" and "Mathematics for Physicists" by Dennery and Krzywicki.
  • A participant questions the relevance of a shared link that discusses analysis textbooks, indicating a focus on linear algebra instead.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the participant's current knowledge in linear algebra based on the recommendations provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of strengthening mathematical skills for theoretical physics, but there is no consensus on specific textbook recommendations or the adequacy of the participant's current knowledge in linear algebra.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of confidence in their mathematical abilities and the relevance of different resources, indicating a range of assumptions about their prior knowledge and learning preferences.

dsatkas
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
I hope this post won't become too tedious.
I've completed my undergrad studies in physics and if things go well i will begin my master's degree in April. The thing is, since my path to graduation has been peculiar (to say the least) I'm kinda weak in maths skills atm and need to improve. I'm going to apply for a master's degree in theoretical physics so it's safe to assume strengthening my math background is almost mandatory. As the title suggests i want to restudy linear algebra. Obviously i don't have to start from scratch, I'm familiar with matrices, determinants, eigenvalues etc. My LA course consisted of computational style of algebra, nothing fancy with mathematical proofs, but i suspect I'm going to need more than that. I have already started reading from Anton which covers basically what i was taught but what should i also read to deepen my understatement? I have read here that Strang, Lang, Axler are good choices but can't afford all of them money and time-wise. I should also point out that at the same time I'm trying to study group theory with applications in physics. What is the difference between Lang's Introduction to LA and LA? Sorry for all the questions. I want to ask more questions but those will come later. I would appreciate any help

ps. I should probably state that I'm not that brilliant of a student and kind of a slow learner
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check this thread. I found most of the PDF pretty easily
 
thank you for the reply but I'm not sure it's very relevant to what I'm asking. They are talking about analysis textbooks and stuff
 
Fair enough. Found it worth passing the link. Another one I would recommend to others is this one by Gerard 't Hooft, but in your case I have doubts (he doesn't mention LA -- to me a sure hint that perhaps what you carry in mental luggage in that area may be adequate already).

My LA isn't all that sophisticated, so I'm glad I will also get an alert when someone else has a good hint for us :smile:.
 
Anyone?
 
In many ways, linearity is the key to physics, so buckling down on the linear algebra sounds like a good idea. I started with Strang's book. After that, I studied the heck out of Don Koks' Explorations in Mathematical Physics. The first chapter "A Trip Down Linear Lane", really helped deepen my understanding of how linear algebra relates to physics. Since then, I've learned a lot from two other books. The first is Mathematics for Physicists by Dennery and Krzywicki. The other is Hassani's book on the foundations of mathematical physics. These last two are arguably not for the mathematically faint of heart.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dsatkas

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K