Mathematical conundrum when adding complex exponentials

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Runei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Mathematical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical treatment of solutions to the infinite square well in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the use of complex exponentials and the implications of representing these solutions as sums of vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a differential equation related to the infinite square well and explores the solution in terms of complex exponentials, questioning the validity of representing the solution as a single complex exponential.
  • Another participant points out that the proposed variable ##k'## should be a function of ##x##, implying that it cannot be treated as a constant when applying derivatives to the wave function.
  • A third participant notes the difference between the expressions ##e^{ix} + e^{-ix}## and ##e^{kix}##, highlighting that the former has no net imaginary component while the latter does, which may affect the interpretation of the solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not reach a consensus, as participants present differing views on the treatment of the complex exponentials and the implications of their representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the implications of treating ##k'## as a function of ##x##, nor do they clarify the conditions under which the representations of the wave function hold true.

Runei
Messages
193
Reaction score
17
Hi there,

Once again I find myself twiddling around with some quantum mechanics, and I bumped into something I find strange. I can't see what the error of my thinking is, so I hope someone could be able to point it out.

I'm looking at solutions to the infinite square well, and arrive at the simple differential equation

\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} = -k^2 \Psi

The solution to this can be written in terms of complex exponentials or sines and cosines. I bumped into the weird stuff when I use complex exponentials.

So the general solution in that case would be

##\Psi(x) = Ae^{ikx}+Be^{-ikx}##

Now, what I then started thinking was: "Hmmm... This could be viewed mathematically as a sum of two vectors, and solution is simply another vector."

So I drew this picture to illustrate the idea:

?temp_hash=98f0bfa6626fe3330472390e3bfc5456.png

So from that perspective it seems that the solution could also be written as

##\Psi(x) = Ce^{ik'x}##

However, using the simple constraints of the infinite square well quickly leads to problems - namely:

##|\Psi(0)|^2 = 0##

##C = 0##

So... Now really what I had hoped for. Where am I going taking a wrong turn? Has it to do with the x? That x should be x' also?

Thanks in advance :)
 

Attachments

  • drawing.png
    drawing.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 708
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that your ##k'## is going to be a function of ##x##. As such, you can not assume it to be constant and apply derivatives to the wave function with that assumption.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and Runei
Consider that ##e^{ix} + e^{-ix}## is equal to ##2 cos(x)## and so has no net imaginary component for all x. But a single ##e^{kix}## always has some net imaginary component (for finite ##k## and ##x##).
 
Thanks guys!

I gave it some more thought and think I nailed it down now.

I have another question now thought, but I'm going to make another thread for it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K