Mathematical conundrum when adding complex exponentials

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Runei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Mathematical
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Runei
Messages
193
Reaction score
17
Hi there,

Once again I find myself twiddling around with some quantum mechanics, and I bumped into something I find strange. I can't see what the error of my thinking is, so I hope someone could be able to point it out.

I'm looking at solutions to the infinite square well, and arrive at the simple differential equation

[tex]\frac{d^2\Psi}{dx^2} = -k^2 \Psi[/tex]

The solution to this can be written in terms of complex exponentials or sines and cosines. I bumped into the weird stuff when I use complex exponentials.

So the general solution in that case would be

##\Psi(x) = Ae^{ikx}+Be^{-ikx}##

Now, what I then started thinking was: "Hmmm... This could be viewed mathematically as a sum of two vectors, and solution is simply another vector."

So I drew this picture to illustrate the idea:

?temp_hash=98f0bfa6626fe3330472390e3bfc5456.png

So from that perspective it seems that the solution could also be written as

##\Psi(x) = Ce^{ik'x}##

However, using the simple constraints of the infinite square well quickly leads to problems - namely:

##|\Psi(0)|^2 = 0##

##C = 0##

So... Now really what I had hoped for. Where am I going taking a wrong turn? Has it to do with the x? That x should be x' also?

Thanks in advance :)
 

Attachments

  • drawing.png
    drawing.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 716
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider that ##e^{ix} + e^{-ix}## is equal to ##2 cos(x)## and so has no net imaginary component for all x. But a single ##e^{kix}## always has some net imaginary component (for finite ##k## and ##x##).
 
Thanks guys!

I gave it some more thought and think I nailed it down now.

I have another question now thought, but I'm going to make another thread for it.