Mathematical induction proof concerning polynomials in Z2.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the polynomial identity \( p_n(x) \cdot p_n(x) = 1 + x^2 + \cdots + x^{2n} \) for \( p_n(x) \in \mathbb{Z}_2[x] \) using mathematical induction. The base case for \( n = 0 \) is confirmed, and the inductive step is established by assuming the identity holds for \( n = k \) and demonstrating it for \( n = k + 1 \). The key insight is that in \( \mathbb{Z}_2 \), the coefficient of 2 vanishes, simplifying the expression significantly. This proof is validated through careful manipulation of polynomial terms and the properties of arithmetic in \( \mathbb{Z}_2 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with polynomial algebra in \( \mathbb{Z}_2[x] \)
  • Knowledge of basic properties of modular arithmetic
  • Ability to manipulate polynomial expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore polynomial operations in finite fields, specifically \( \mathbb{Z}_2 \)
  • Learn about the implications of coefficients in modular arithmetic
  • Investigate other polynomial identities and their proofs in \( \mathbb{Z}_2[x] \)
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and number theory, as well as anyone interested in the properties of polynomials over finite fields.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For each [tex]n\,\in\,\mathbb{N}[/tex], let [tex]p_n(x)\,\in\,\mathbb{Z}_2[x][/tex] be the polynomial

[tex]1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,x^{n\,-\,1}\,+\,x^n[/tex]

Use mathematical induction to prove that

[tex]p_n(x)\,\cdot\,p_n(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+x^{2n\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2n}[/tex]

Homework Equations



Induction steps.

[tex]p_k(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{k\,-\,1}\,+\,x^k[/tex]

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^k\,+\,x^{k\,+\,1}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it true for n = 0?

[tex]p_0(x)\,\cdot\,p_0(x)\,=\,1[/tex]

Yes.Assume that

[tex]p_k(x)\,\cdot\,p_k(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}[/tex]

is true.

So now I need to show that

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

is true.
So I start by writing

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(p_k(x)\,+\,x^{k\,+\,1}\right)\,\left(p_k(x)\,+\,x^{k\,+\,1}\right)[/tex]

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,p_k(x)\,p_k(x)\,+\,2\,p_k(x)\,x^{k\,+\,1}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

Assuming that the [tex]p_k(x)[/tex] case is true...

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}\right)\,+\,2\,\left(1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{k\,-\,1}\,+\,x^k\right)\,x^{k\,+\,1}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}\right)\,+\overbrace{\,2\,\left(x^{k\,+\,1}\,+\,x^{k\,+\,2}\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,1}\right)}^{0}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]But now what do I do??Thanks to Sethric!

Since we are working in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_2[/tex], the middle term is zero [tex]\left(0\,\equiv\,2\,(mod\,2)\right)[/tex] and the expression becomes

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}\right)\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

[tex]\therefore\,\,\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}\,\,\,\blacklozenge[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What does that coefficient of 2 do when you are dealing with Z_2?
 
Thanks so much! I thought that [tex]p_n(x)\,\in\,\mathbb{Z}_2[/tex] would come into play somehow; it was right in front of me!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K