Mathematical induction proof concerning polynomials in Z2.

In summary, the conversation discusses using mathematical induction to prove that the polynomial p_n(x) \in \mathbb{Z}_2[x] satisfies the equation p_n(x) \cdot p_n(x) = 1 + x^2 + \cdots + x^{2n-2} + x^{2n}. The expert summarizer explains the steps of the proof, including the use of the fact that in \mathbb{Z}_2, the coefficient of 2 is equivalent to 0.
  • #1
VinnyCee
489
0

Homework Statement



For each [tex]n\,\in\,\mathbb{N}[/tex], let [tex]p_n(x)\,\in\,\mathbb{Z}_2[x][/tex] be the polynomial

[tex]1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,x^{n\,-\,1}\,+\,x^n[/tex]

Use mathematical induction to prove that

[tex]p_n(x)\,\cdot\,p_n(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+x^{2n\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2n}[/tex]

Homework Equations



Induction steps.

[tex]p_k(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{k\,-\,1}\,+\,x^k[/tex]

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^k\,+\,x^{k\,+\,1}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it true for n = 0?

[tex]p_0(x)\,\cdot\,p_0(x)\,=\,1[/tex]

Yes.Assume that

[tex]p_k(x)\,\cdot\,p_k(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}[/tex]

is true.

So now I need to show that

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

is true.
So I start by writing

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(p_k(x)\,+\,x^{k\,+\,1}\right)\,\left(p_k(x)\,+\,x^{k\,+\,1}\right)[/tex]

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,p_k(x)\,p_k(x)\,+\,2\,p_k(x)\,x^{k\,+\,1}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

Assuming that the [tex]p_k(x)[/tex] case is true...

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}\right)\,+\,2\,\left(1\,+\,x\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{k\,-\,1}\,+\,x^k\right)\,x^{k\,+\,1}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}\right)\,+\overbrace{\,2\,\left(x^{k\,+\,1}\,+\,x^{k\,+\,2}\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,1}\right)}^{0}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]But now what do I do??Thanks to Sethric!

Since we are working in [tex]\mathbb{Z}_2[/tex], the middle term is zero [tex]\left(0\,\equiv\,2\,(mod\,2)\right)[/tex] and the expression becomes

[tex]p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,\left(1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k\,-\,2}\,+\,x^{2k}\right)\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}[/tex]

[tex]\therefore\,\,\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,\cdot\,p_{k\,+\,1}(x)\,=\,1\,+\,x^2\,+\,\cdots\,+\,x^{2k}\,+\,x^{2k\,+\,2}\,\,\,\blacklozenge[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What does that coefficient of 2 do when you are dealing with Z_2?
 
  • #3
Thanks so much! I thought that [tex]p_n(x)\,\in\,\mathbb{Z}_2[/tex] would come into play somehow; it was right in front of me!
 
Last edited:

1. What is mathematical induction?

Mathematical induction is a method of mathematical proof used to prove statements about a set of natural numbers or other well-ordered sets. It involves proving that a statement is true for a base case, usually the number 0 or 1, and then proving that if the statement is true for a particular number, it is also true for the next number in the sequence.

2. How is mathematical induction used in proof concerning polynomials in Z2?

In this context, mathematical induction is used to prove that a polynomial is true for all values in the set Z2, which consists of the numbers 0 and 1. The base case is usually proved by substituting 0 and 1 into the polynomial and showing that it is true. Then, the inductive step involves showing that if the polynomial is true for a particular value, it is also true for the next value in the sequence.

3. What are some common mistakes to avoid when using mathematical induction?

One common mistake is assuming that the statement is true for all numbers in the set without first proving the base case. Another mistake is assuming that the statement is true for a particular number without proving the inductive step. It is also important to ensure that the statement is true for all possible values in the set, not just a few examples.

4. Can mathematical induction be used to prove statements about other sets besides natural numbers?

Yes, mathematical induction can be used to prove statements about other well-ordered sets, such as integers or rational numbers. It can also be used to prove statements about more complex mathematical structures, such as graphs or trees.

5. Are there alternative methods to mathematical induction for proving statements?

Yes, there are alternative methods such as direct proof, proof by contradiction, and proof by contrapositive. These methods may be more suitable for certain types of statements or may be easier to understand and use in certain situations. However, mathematical induction is a powerful and widely used method for proving statements about well-ordered sets.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
490
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
868
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
544
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
262
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
515
Replies
1
Views
570
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
994
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
510
Back
Top