Mathematical Induction using a strong hypothesis

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving a formula for a sequence defined recursively, specifically using mathematical induction. The sequence is defined with initial conditions and a recurrence relation, and the goal is to show that the general term can be expressed as a power of 2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the inductive hypothesis and the steps taken to prove the formula. There are questions about the clarity of the inductive step and how it relates to the original hypothesis.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confidence in the approach taken, while others seek clarification on the inductive hypothesis and its application. There is an ongoing exploration of the steps involved in the induction process, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention confusion regarding the application of the inductive step and the necessity of following a specific form for the sequence. There is a sense of uncertainty about the correctness of the approach after multiple attempts at similar problems.

mamma_mia66
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a0=1, and a1=2, and

an=(a(n-1))^2/an-2 for n>=2,
prove by induction that an=2^n for n>=0



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(B) a0=1=2^0=1 yes is true
a1=2=2^1=2 yes is true

(I) ak=(2k-1)^2/2k-2=2k

Is it true that what I solved. It seems very easy.

I started first with a(k+1)=(a(k+1-1))^2/a(k+1-2)=
(2k)^2(k-1)=2(k+1)
Please someone help if I am doing something wrong. I will appreciate. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems that you have the right idea, but I do not know what is different between (I) and your solution for ak+1. Where precisely is your inductive hypothesis?
 
It IS very easy. So your induction step is: if a_{k-1}=2^(k-1) and a_{k-2}=2^(k-2) then a_k=2^(k) (by doing the algebra you doubtless did). It looks fine to me.
 
That is where I am confused. I know that I need to fallow the form an=2^n

Then I don't need to do a(k+1)...

I did so many problems in my HW and now I don't get it what I am doing:smile:
 
Thank you guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K