Mathematical solution for single leg hanging basket

8 replies · 3K views · last reply
James Hayes
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Picture a basket, connected to a hanging point (ML), from two fixings (F). One of these ropes connecting these points snaps, and the basket shifts and drops on one side. Resulting in the rope snagging onto a pivot point (P). We know the mass, the length of a couple dimensions. I want to know a method of calculating the angle theta, shown in the last diagram. Point F and G and P are all fixed in place and do not move. Please see PDF for more information.
Two side-by-side diagrams of a hanging basket mechanism: a blue block G suspended from a pivot ML by cables to rollers P and F on vertical rails, shown upright and tilted. Labels list mass at G 329kg, L1 = 0.284mm, L2 = 1.457mm.
Diagram of a double pendulum: a blue circle labelled ML hangs from a pivot, with a second blue bob on a rod of length L1, an orange bob on rod L2, and a yellow bob with a downward arrow. Dashed line and angle theta marked from vertical.
 
Attachments
Hello @James Hayes , :welcome: !

Is this homework or do you consider designing a balloon with basket ?

James Hayes said:
the basket shifts and drops on one side. Resulting in the rope snagging onto a pivot point (P)
And if nothing dampens the swinging ?
(I find the "Point F and G and P are all fixed in place" pretty questionable for G !)

Never mind, I suppose you silently assume the swinging terminates, at which time G should be directly underneath ML. Right ?

PFG is a triangle that keeps its shape, but rotates. How far is undeteermined since you give no sideways distances. Additionally, ##\theta## can not be calculated as long as ML to P is unknown
 
Hi

F, G and P are fixed. But surely the center of gravity does not need to be directly underneath the lifting point ML. The black line from ML to P to F is a rope, it does not 'fix' to P, it simply is wrapped around P. Surely, the tension in the rope pulling on fixing point 'F', around pivot point p will cause the center of gravity to shift out from being directly underneath, as this creates a force in X from point F.

thank you
 
James Hayes said:
But surely the center of gravity does not need to be directly underneath the lifting point ML.
If it is not, there will be a net torque due to gravity that will cause movement, no?
 
The system will hang such as to minimize the gravitational potential energy. This requires the C M to be directly below the support, as @berkeman man has observed.

These are really small dimensions!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Dr.D said:
These are really small dimensions!
Oh jeeze, I missed that. Especially small considering the mass... :wink:

Diagram with text reading Mass at G: 329kg, L1 = 0.284mm (P to F), L2 = 1.457mm (G to ML), above a blue circle labelled ML with two lines extending downward from it.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BvU
berkeman said:
Oh jeeze, I missed that. Especially small considering the mass... :wink:

View attachment 276314
It is just very high density material!
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
James Hayes said:
Hi

F, G and P are fixed. But surely the center of gravity does not need to be directly underneath the lifting point ML.
Welcome, James! :cool:

On the contrary, points ML and G must be on the same vertical line.
That vertical line should intersect the line joining P and F somewhere.
That point of intersection depends on dimensions that are not provided by the problem.
For example, x and y distances between G and F or ML and F.
 
It seems to me the rope from ML to P must be vertical in the steady state, otherwise there would be a sideways force on the body and it would swing. Therefore, Theta is zero, and ML, P and G are all on the same line vertically. The angle ML-P-F is determined by geometry.