MHB MathHelp's Work Problem from Yahoo Answers

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus: Work problems help needed?

Need help on this work problem

You are on top of the roof of 120 meter tall building with a 120 meter rope weighing 5kg. Another person on the ground at the base with another 120 meter metal rope weighing 60kg and a bucket with weight of 4kg holding 40kg of sand. Acceleration of gravity is 9.81 m/sec^2.

a) You drop one end of the rope off the building and the other person attaches the end of his metal rope to your rope. How much work do you do pulling the rope back up the roof so that the metal rope is dangling from the edge of the roof down to the ground.

b)Your friend then attaches the end of the metal rope to the bucket. How much work do you do pulling bucket and the metal rope up to the roof?

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: MathHelp's question at Yahoo! Answers regading the computation of work hauling ropes

Hello MathHelp,

Let's let:

$h$ = the height of the building.

$\rho_1$ = the linear mass density of the less dense rope.

$m_1$ = the total mass of the less dense rope.

$\rho_2$ = the linear mass density of the more dense rope.

$m_2$ = the total mass of the more dense rope.

$\ell$ = the mass of the load hauled at the end of the second rope in part b).

a) Once the two ropes are fixed together, the person at the top of the building begins hauling up the two rope system, with the lighter rope essentially being replaced with the heavier rope. Let's orient a vertical axis $y$ with the origin at the ground. Initially, the point where the two ropes are attached is at the origin.

At some arbitrary point in time during the process of hauling the rope up, this point of attachment is at the point $y$, where $y$ is the length of heavier rope being suspended, and $h-y$ is the length of lighter rope being suspended. The incremental amount of work to move this point up a height $dy$ is then given by:

$$dW=g\left(\rho_1(h-y)+\rho_2y \right)\,dy=g\left(\rho_1h+\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)y \right)\,dy$$

The summation of these increments of work by integration reveals:

$$W=g\int_0^h \rho_1h+\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)y\,dy=g\left[\rho_1hy+\frac{1}{2}\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)y^2 \right]_0^h=g\left(\rho_1h^2+\frac{1}{2}\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)h^2 \right)=\frac{gh^2\left(\rho_1+\rho_2 \right)}{2}$$

Now, since we have:

$$\rho_1=\frac{m_1}{h},\,\rho_2=\frac{m_2}{h}$$

we may write:

$$W=\frac{gh\left(m_1+m_2 \right)}{2}$$

Plugging in the given data:

$$g=9.81\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2},\,m_1=5\text{ kg},\,m_2=\text{ 60 kg},\,h=120\text{ m}$$

we find:

$$W=\frac{\left(9.81\dfrac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2} \right)\left(120\text{ m} \right)\left((5+60)\text{ kg} \right)}{2}=38.259\text{ kJ}$$

b) This time, the load is decreasing as the rope hauled up is not replaced. So we may state the increment of work with the bucket at $y$ is:

$$dW=g\left(\ell+\rho_2(h-y) \right)\,dy=g\left(\left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)-\rho_2y) \right)\,dy$$

The summation of these increments of work by integration reveals:

$$W=g\int_0^h \left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)-\rho_2y\,dy=g\left[\left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)y-\frac{1}{2}\rho_2y^2 \right]_0^h=gh\left(\left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)-\frac{1}{2}\rho_2h \right)=\frac{gh\left(2\ell+m_2 \right)}{2}$$

Plugging in the given data:

$$g=9.81\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2},\,h=120\text{ m},\ell=44\text{ kg},\,m_2=\text{ 60 kg}$$

we find:

$$W=\frac{\left(9.81\dfrac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2} \right)\left(120\text{ m} \right)\left(\left(2\cdot44+60 \right)\text{ kg} \right)}{2}=87.1128\text{ kJ}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top