MHB MathHelp's Work Problem from Yahoo Answers

AI Thread Summary
The work problem involves calculating the work done in two scenarios: first, pulling a lighter rope up to the roof after it is attached to a heavier rope, and second, pulling a bucket attached to the heavier rope. For part a, the total work calculated is approximately 38.259 kJ, derived from the combined weights of the ropes and the height of the building. In part b, the work done to pull the bucket and the metal rope up is approximately 87.1128 kJ, taking into account the decreasing load as the bucket is raised. The calculations utilize the principles of linear mass density and gravitational force. The final results provide a clear understanding of the work involved in both scenarios.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Calculus: Work problems help needed?

Need help on this work problem

You are on top of the roof of 120 meter tall building with a 120 meter rope weighing 5kg. Another person on the ground at the base with another 120 meter metal rope weighing 60kg and a bucket with weight of 4kg holding 40kg of sand. Acceleration of gravity is 9.81 m/sec^2.

a) You drop one end of the rope off the building and the other person attaches the end of his metal rope to your rope. How much work do you do pulling the rope back up the roof so that the metal rope is dangling from the edge of the roof down to the ground.

b)Your friend then attaches the end of the metal rope to the bucket. How much work do you do pulling bucket and the metal rope up to the roof?

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: MathHelp's question at Yahoo! Answers regading the computation of work hauling ropes

Hello MathHelp,

Let's let:

$h$ = the height of the building.

$\rho_1$ = the linear mass density of the less dense rope.

$m_1$ = the total mass of the less dense rope.

$\rho_2$ = the linear mass density of the more dense rope.

$m_2$ = the total mass of the more dense rope.

$\ell$ = the mass of the load hauled at the end of the second rope in part b).

a) Once the two ropes are fixed together, the person at the top of the building begins hauling up the two rope system, with the lighter rope essentially being replaced with the heavier rope. Let's orient a vertical axis $y$ with the origin at the ground. Initially, the point where the two ropes are attached is at the origin.

At some arbitrary point in time during the process of hauling the rope up, this point of attachment is at the point $y$, where $y$ is the length of heavier rope being suspended, and $h-y$ is the length of lighter rope being suspended. The incremental amount of work to move this point up a height $dy$ is then given by:

$$dW=g\left(\rho_1(h-y)+\rho_2y \right)\,dy=g\left(\rho_1h+\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)y \right)\,dy$$

The summation of these increments of work by integration reveals:

$$W=g\int_0^h \rho_1h+\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)y\,dy=g\left[\rho_1hy+\frac{1}{2}\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)y^2 \right]_0^h=g\left(\rho_1h^2+\frac{1}{2}\left(\rho_2-\rho_1 \right)h^2 \right)=\frac{gh^2\left(\rho_1+\rho_2 \right)}{2}$$

Now, since we have:

$$\rho_1=\frac{m_1}{h},\,\rho_2=\frac{m_2}{h}$$

we may write:

$$W=\frac{gh\left(m_1+m_2 \right)}{2}$$

Plugging in the given data:

$$g=9.81\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2},\,m_1=5\text{ kg},\,m_2=\text{ 60 kg},\,h=120\text{ m}$$

we find:

$$W=\frac{\left(9.81\dfrac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2} \right)\left(120\text{ m} \right)\left((5+60)\text{ kg} \right)}{2}=38.259\text{ kJ}$$

b) This time, the load is decreasing as the rope hauled up is not replaced. So we may state the increment of work with the bucket at $y$ is:

$$dW=g\left(\ell+\rho_2(h-y) \right)\,dy=g\left(\left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)-\rho_2y) \right)\,dy$$

The summation of these increments of work by integration reveals:

$$W=g\int_0^h \left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)-\rho_2y\,dy=g\left[\left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)y-\frac{1}{2}\rho_2y^2 \right]_0^h=gh\left(\left(\ell+\rho_2h \right)-\frac{1}{2}\rho_2h \right)=\frac{gh\left(2\ell+m_2 \right)}{2}$$

Plugging in the given data:

$$g=9.81\frac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2},\,h=120\text{ m},\ell=44\text{ kg},\,m_2=\text{ 60 kg}$$

we find:

$$W=\frac{\left(9.81\dfrac{\text{m}}{\text{s}^2} \right)\left(120\text{ m} \right)\left(\left(2\cdot44+60 \right)\text{ kg} \right)}{2}=87.1128\text{ kJ}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top