Matrices - finding critical values

  • Thread starter Thread starter steelphantom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the value of k for which a system of linear equations has exactly one solution. The equations are represented in an augmented matrix form, and the discussion revolves around the implications of reducing this matrix and the conditions under which the system remains consistent.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of row reduction of the augmented matrix and question the correctness of the initial equations. There are attempts to identify values of k that lead to either unique solutions or contradictions in the system.

Discussion Status

Participants have explored various steps in reducing the matrix and have raised questions about the implications of specific values of k. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions under which the determinant of the matrix may affect the existence of solutions, but no consensus has been reached on the final interpretation of k's values.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the value of k = -1 leading to contradictions in the system, while the implications of k = 0 are also debated. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the conditions for a unique solution in the context of linear algebra.

steelphantom
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find k so that the system has exactly one solution.

[tex]\left{ \begin {array} {rcl} x - y + 2z = 1 \\ -x + y - z = 2 \\ x + ky + z = 3 \end {array} \right .[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I create an augmented matrix here:
[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ -1 & 1 & -1 & 2 \\ 1 & k & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

Here I do the following: R2+R1 and R3-R1.
[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \\ 0 & k+1 & -1 & 2 \end {array} \right][/tex]

R2 <=> R3.
[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & k+1 & -1 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

(1/k+1)R2.
[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & -1/(k+1) & 2/(k+1) \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

At this point, I'm stuck. How do I know which k will give the system exactly one solution?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your first equation correct? It does not match with your matrix.

Have you learned about eigenvalues?
 
desA said:
Is your first equation correct? It does not match with your matrix.

Have you learned about eigenvalues?

Sorry; I just fixed it. Everything should be correct now. We haven't learned about eigenvalues yet.
 
Would reducing your matrix all the way to the identity matrix help?
 
desA said:
Would reducing your matrix all the way to the identity matrix help?

We haven't even gone over the identity matrix yet. :redface: I think I may have come up with a solution:

[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & k+1 & -1 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

OK, in this form, if k = -1, the second and third rows would be contradictory (i.e. no solution):

[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

However, if k were anything else, there should be exactly one solution, right? So is the answer all real numbers except -1, or am I totally off-base here?
 
Looks like 'a' solution. How would you know if there were others, or not?

The identity matrix has ones on the diagonal, & zeros everywhere else. Basically continue your reduction method, or back-substitute from where you are, to obtain complete expressions for x,y,z in terms of k & then make a decision.

This will give you the full solution for x, y, z & you could then re-check your current solution.
 
Ok, I've reduced my matrix to the identity matrix. Here are my steps:

[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & k+1 & -1 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & k+1 & 0 & 5 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 5/(k+1) \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 0 & -5 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 5/(k+1) \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & 0 & 0 & 5/(k+1) - 5 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 5/(k+1) \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

After all these steps, my final identity matrix looks like this:
[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & 0 & 0 & -5k/(k+1) \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 5/(k+1) \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]

So now it looks like the possible values of k are all real numbers except -1 and 0. Is this correct?
 
Why could k not be 0? Isn't x= 0, y= 5, z= 3 an acceptable solution?

The matrix equation, Ax= b, will have a single solution as long as det(A) is not 0. Since there is only one k in the matrix, det(A)= 0 will be a linear equation in k. There should be only one value of k for which this system does not have a single solution.

You could have seen that back in your original reduction:
[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & k+1 & -1 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]
If the "pivot", k+ 1, is 0 then you cannot have a single solution.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Why could k not be 0? Isn't x= 0, y= 5, z= 3 an acceptable solution?

The matrix equation, Ax= b, will have a single solution as long as det(A) is not 0. Since there is only one k in the matrix, det(A)= 0 will be a linear equation in k. There should be only one value of k for which this system does not have a single solution.

You could have seen that back in your original reduction:
[tex]\left[ \begin {array} {ccc|r} 1 & -1 & 2 & 1 \\ 0 & k+1 & -1 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 3 \end {array} \right][/tex]
If the "pivot", k+ 1, is 0 then you cannot have a single solution.

Wow, how dumb of me... :redface: Of course k=0 is a solution! For some reason I was looking at it like 1=0. :confused: So it looks like the only value that won't work is -1, as I thought earlier. Thanks!
 
  • #10
Hence, it's always necessary to create a 'discussion' before dividing with k+1, as in post #7, since, for k = -1 the term is undefined.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K