Matrices, how to get this equality

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ry122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of a matrix represented by the equations ax + y = 1 and x + y = b. The original poster seeks clarification on how to manipulate the matrix to achieve equality with the identity matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for finding the inverse of the matrix, including row reduction techniques and questioning the validity of the initial setup. Some participants suggest reconsidering the approach of multiplying rows by zero and discuss alternative row operations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into row operations and matrix manipulation. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the initial equality and the steps needed to find the inverse, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion surrounding the equality sign in the original poster's question and the implications of the variable 'a' in the matrix. There are also indications of imposed homework constraints that may affect the discussion.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
How do I get the right side of the equation to equal the left side?[tex] <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 & 0 \\ <br /> 0 & 1<br /> \end{bmatrix} = <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> a & 1 \\ <br /> 1 & 1<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> [/tex]

I tried multiplying the first row by 0 to get rid of a is this is the right first step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They aren't equal because 0 is not equal to 1. Face it. Massaging it won't change that.
 
Sorry I should have explained a bit better.

What I'm trying to do is find the inverse matrix of
ax + y = 1
x + y = b

I don't think that equal sign should be in there
 
Ry122 said:
Sorry I should have explained a bit better.

What I'm trying to do is find the inverse matrix of
ax + y = 1
x + y = b

I don't think that equal sign should be in there

Then multiplying the first row by 0 seems like a pretty poor idea. Now you've got NOTHING in the first row. How about multiplying by 1/a, so you can subtract the first row from the second and get a 0 in the lower left part of the original matrix?
 
So your question is "How do I find the inverse to
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}a & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{array}\right][/tex]?

One way to do that is to use, directly, the definitiion: Find x, y, z u, so that
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}a & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{array}\right][left[\begin{array}{cc}x & y \\ z & u\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right][/tex].

That is the same as solving the equation ax+ z= 1, ay+ u= 0, x+ z= 0, y+ u= 1 for x, y, z, u.

But I suspect you are talking about "row reduction". The "row operations" are
1) Swap two rows
2) Multiply one row by a number
3) Add a multiple of one row to another.

In order to row reduce [itex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}a & 1 \\ 1 & 1 \end{array}\right] do the following:<br /> <br /> Normally, the simplest way to get a "1" on the diagonal is to multiply the entire row by 1 over whatever is on the diagona. Here, since we already have a '1' directly below a, I would swap the first and second rows to get<br /> [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 1 \\ a & 1\end{array}\right][/tex]<br /> To get a "0" below that, subtract a times the first row from the second (do you see how I decided to use "a time"? Since we have a "1" just above the"a", we use a/1= a.)<br /> [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 1 \\ 0& 1-a\end{array}\right][/tex]<br /> Now you want to get a "1" on the diagonal, in the lower right. Since that is 1- a now, the obvious thing to do is divide that row by 1- a. Notice that does not change the first row:<br /> [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 1 \\ 0& 1\end{array}\right][/tex]<br /> Finally, subtract the second row from the first and you are done:<br /> [tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 0& 1\end{array}\right][/tex]<br /> Now if you apply those same row operations to the identity matrix, in the same order, you get the inverse matrix. Of course, it is simpler to write the matrices A and the identity matrix side-by-side and do the row operations to both matrices at the same time.[/itex]
 
thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K