MHB Matrix Algebra 2.0 Help: Solving Questions with Cosine Laws

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving polar coordinates and the application of cosine laws. A participant expresses confusion about how to approach the problem but recognizes that rotating a point through a counter-clockwise angle using polar coordinates is key. They discuss the transformation of coordinates and the potential for reflecting across an axis before rotating back. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding geometric transformations in matrix algebra. Overall, the focus is on applying cosine laws and geometric principles to solve the posed question.
saifh
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

So I'm stuck on another question from the previous one that I posted and would absolutely love it if I can get some help regarding how to attempt this. I literally have no clue at how to go by solving it. I have a feeling for question one that the cosine laws might come in handy but I'm not sure..

View attachment 4833

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • 2003_2.JPG
    2003_2.JPG
    57.3 KB · Views: 88
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's take part (i). You have a point, which we'll write in polar coordinates as
$$\mathbf{x}=r\begin{bmatrix} \cos(\varphi) \\ \sin(\varphi)\end{bmatrix}.$$
As the problem states, we need to rotate this point through a counter-clockwise angle $\theta$ so as to get the point
$$\mathbf{x}'=r\begin{bmatrix} \cos(\varphi+\theta) \\ \sin(\varphi+\theta)\end{bmatrix}.$$
Does this second expression suggest anything to you?
 
Ackbach said:
Let's take part (i). You have a point, which we'll write in polar coordinates as
$$\mathbf{x}=r\begin{bmatrix} \cos(\varphi) \\ \sin(\varphi)\end{bmatrix}.$$
As the problem states, we need to rotate this point through a counter-clockwise angle $\theta$ so as to get the point
$$\mathbf{x}'=r\begin{bmatrix} \cos(\varphi+\theta) \\ \sin(\varphi+\theta)\end{bmatrix}.$$
Does this second expression suggest anything to you?

Ahh ok thanks, I will work off that. That does make more sense thanks.
 
It's so much easier to reflect across one of the axes...hmm, I wonder...could we rotate our line of reflection to an axis, reflect, and rotate back-does that even work?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K