Matrix Multiplication for Vertical Vectors

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cosmossos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Multiplication
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the multiplication of vertical vectors in matrix algebra, specifically the challenge of multiplying two 3x1 matrices, denoted as x, y, z and a, b, c. It is established that direct multiplication is not possible due to the mismatch in dimensions; however, transposing one of the vectors allows for the calculation of their inner product. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the transpose operation and its implications in matrix multiplication, particularly in the context of integrals involving these vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix dimensions and multiplication rules
  • Knowledge of vector transposition and its effects
  • Familiarity with inner products in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of integrals involving vector functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix transposition in linear algebra
  • Learn about inner products and their applications in vector spaces
  • Explore the implications of vector multiplication in calculus
  • Investigate the use of complex conjugation in matrix operations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with linear algebra concepts, particularly those working with vector operations and integrals.

Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I came to some problems with multiplcation of some matrices.
how do I multply this:
x
y
z

with
a
b
c

those are vertical vectors.
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not possible to multiply those two vectors using matrix multiplication. To multiply two matrices, the number of columns of the first must equal the number of rows of the second. Both of your matrices are 3x1 and cannot therefore mutliply each other. If you were to transpose one, then you could multiply them.
 
...and that would be their inner product.
 
I know , that's why I didn't have a clue what to do. the problem is that I don't have a choice becasue I got integral like this:
untitled.JPG

And it's given in the question
 
...and that would be their inner product.

Only when you transpose the first vector. If you transpose the second vector you will get a 3x3 matrix.
 
@rochfor: true
@Cosmossos: you are forgetting the psi which is in between!
 
so? I can put the psi in the beginning ,no?

I got the same problem here:
untitled.JPG

How do I make it look like:
untitled1.JPG
?
It makes sense if I think about it as a scalar product, but I don't know how ...
 
Last edited:
Of course not, since then you end up with your first question about an undefined product! You can't evaluate an integral if you don't understand what the terms in the integrand mean.
 
so what do I do? Psi is a function after all Can you reread my question? I added some things
 
  • #10
Thanks I got it!
 
  • #11
I believe you are trying to take the deger of the column vector, don't forget that deger acts also as a transpose operator (and also complex conjugation), so \psi ^{+} is a row vector with components (\psi_{1}*, \psi_{2}*)


P.S. Are you taking a course in the Technion?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K