Matrix representation for (S1+S2)^2 operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the matrix representation of the operator (S1+S2)^2, where the user has derived the matrix using two methods: Sakurai's approach and direct products of Pauli matrices. Despite both methods yielding the same matrix, the eigenvalues do not match the expected results, indicating a fundamental error in the user's procedure. The user seeks assistance in identifying the correct matrix representation or eigenvalues without a detailed derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically angular momentum operators.
  • Familiarity with matrix representations of operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices and their properties.
  • Experience with eigenvalue problems in linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the matrix representation for angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the properties and applications of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the process of calculating eigenvalues and eigenvectors for matrices.
  • Explore Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for detailed methodologies on operator representations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with angular momentum, and anyone involved in theoretical physics or linear algebra applications.

martina
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've derived the matrix using two different, but equivalent methods (the one described in the above link-Sakurai and by calculating the direct products of Pauli matrices) and it came out the same, yet its eigenvalues are not what I know they must be, so there must be something fundamentally wrong in my procedure, but I just can't detect it. If you happen to know how the matrix looks like without a detailed derivation, I'd be grateful for that too, cause I'm really stuck here :frown:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K