How Does Subtracting c from ann Affect Matrix Singularity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ylle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
Subtracting c from the element ann of a non-singular n x n matrix A results in a new matrix B that becomes singular. The value c is defined as det(A) divided by the cofactor Ann. The discussion involves manipulating the determinant equation to show that the determinant of B equals zero when c is subtracted from ann. To illustrate this, the matrix B is defined to have the same elements as A, except for the (n,n) entry, which is modified. Calculating the determinant of B confirms its singularity, completing the proof.
Ylle
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let A be a non-singular n x n matrix with a non-zero cofactor Ann and let

c = det(A) / Ann

Show that if we subtract c from ann, then the resulting matrix will be singular.


Homework Equations



det(A) = a1nA1n+...+annAnn


The Attempt at a Solution



Well, if I replace det(A) with the one in "Relevant eq.", and multiply both sides with Ann I get:

cAnn = a1nA1n+...+annAnn

Then if I subtract cAnn from both sides i get:

0 = a1nA1n+...+annAnn - cAnn
, which we can rewrite to:

0 = a1nA1n+...+(ann-c)Ann


And now I'm not sure if I'm done ?

It seems like I need to define another matrix of some sort to define det(B) = 0.
But I'm not quite sure how I do that. Can anyone give me a hint ? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ylle said:

Homework Statement


Let A be a non-singular n x n matrix with a non-zero cofactor Ann and let

c = det(A) / Ann

Show that if we subtract c from ann, then the resulting matrix will be singular.

Homework Equations



det(A) = a1nA1n+...+annAnn

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, if I replace det(A) with the one in "Relevant eq.", and multiply both sides with Ann I get:

cAnn = a1nA1n+...+annAnn

Then if I subtract cAnn from both sides i get:

0 = a1nA1n+...+annAnn - cAnn
, which we can rewrite to:

0 = a1nA1n+...+(ann-c)AnnAnd now I'm not sure if I'm done ?

It seems like I need to define another matrix of some sort to define det(B) = 0.
But I'm not quite sure how I do that. Can anyone give me a hint ? :)

Yes, define a matrix B which is exactly the same as A except for the (n,n) element, which will be

a_{nn} - c instead of a_{nn}

Then calculate det(B) the same way you calculated det(A), and compare the answers you get.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K