Matter into energy at high velocity

In summary, the annihilation of a proton and its anti-matter counterpart in open space results in a burst of energy. However, when viewed from a frame of reference where the particles are moving at a high relative speed, the mass and energy of the particles are seven times greater. This is due to the frequency shift caused by the relative velocity. Conservation of energy applies only when all energies are measured in the same frame, and both mass and energy are present before and after annihilation.
  • #1
ripoli85
5
0
hello forum, i got another question:

1st frame of reference:
a proton and its anti matter counter part are next to each other in open space. they have no relative speed to the frame of reference. suddenly they annihilate each other and a burst of energy appears.

2nd frame of reference:
the same proton and its anti matter counter part are next to each other flying through space with a relative speed of 99% the speed of light. from this perspective the two particles have a mass seven times greater then their mass is in the 1st frame of reference. Since energy is being conserved in either of those frames, the annihilation of the two particles should result in a burst of energy that is seven times greater than in the first frame of reference.
My question is: What is accounting for the extra energy in the second frame of reference? Is it that a part of the electromagnetic radiation(of the annihilation) has been shifted to very short wavelength and therefore very high energy radiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is it that a part of the electromagnetic radiation(of the annihilation) has been shifted to very short wavelength and therefore very high energy radiation?
Yes, it's the frequency shift caused by the relative velocity. Momentum depends on which frame it is measured from.
 
  • #3
Energy is a frame-dependent concept: the energy measured in one frame is different from the energy measured in another frame. This is true even in Newtonian physics -- kinetic energy depends on velocity which is frame-dependent.

Conservation of energy applies only when all of the energies are measured in the same frame.
 
  • #4
To put things in different terms, I think this calls for E=mc2. (So we are now presuming relativistic mass for m.)

Both the mass and the energy are there all along. The energy has only changed form upon annihilation. So we don't have to talk about a burst of energy.

In the frame of reference where the center of mass of the particles are moving with respect to an observer, both the energy and mass are greater before and after annihilation.
 

What is "Matter into energy at high velocity"?

"Matter into energy at high velocity" refers to the process of converting matter (such as atoms or particles) into energy by accelerating it to high speeds. This is typically achieved through nuclear reactions or particle accelerators.

What is the relationship between matter and energy?

According to Einstein's famous equation E=mc^2, matter and energy are two forms of the same thing. Matter can be converted into energy and vice versa. This is demonstrated in nuclear reactions and is the basis for technologies such as nuclear power and nuclear weapons.

How does high velocity affect the conversion of matter into energy?

High velocity is necessary for the conversion of matter into energy because it provides the necessary energy to overcome the binding forces within atoms or particles. This allows for the breaking apart and transformation of matter into energy.

What are some real-life applications of "Matter into energy at high velocity"?

One of the most well-known applications is nuclear power, where the energy released from nuclear reactions is used to generate electricity. Particle accelerators are also used in scientific research, such as in particle physics experiments to study the fundamental building blocks of matter.

Are there any risks associated with "Matter into energy at high velocity"?

Yes, there are potential risks associated with the conversion of matter into energy, especially in the case of nuclear reactions. These risks include radiation exposure, environmental contamination, and the potential for accidents or meltdowns. Strict safety measures and regulations are in place to mitigate these risks.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
791
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
998
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
435
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
892
Back
Top