Max Height of Swing in Circular Motion

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height of a child's swing supported by 4.0m chains, given its speed of 6.0 m/s and height of 0.50m above the ground when the chains are vertical. The key approach involves using conservation of energy, where the kinetic energy at the lowest point is converted into potential energy at the maximum height. The calculated change in height (Δy) is derived from the equation Δy = vi^2 / (2g), resulting in 1.84m. Adding this to the initial height of 0.50m gives a total height of 2.34m. The length of the swing chain is acknowledged as potentially relevant for further calculations or understanding the problem's context.
ally1h
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A child's playground swing is supported by chains that are 4.0m long. If the swing is 0.50m above the ground and moving at 6.0 m/s when the chains are vertical, what is the maximum height of the swing?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Back again.. this time I am LOST. I feel like this should be a circular motion type of problem, but that doesn't entirely make sense since I'm working on energy conservation, linear momentum, torque, and angular momentum. This is what I DO understand:

radius = 4.0m
vi = 6.0 m/s
vf = 0 m/s
The total height is whatever it is plus 0.50m.

I'm lost because I have no clue how to do the problem without a time component or a mass component or an angle. I understand that gravity plays a vertical role, slowing down the speed of the swing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ally1h said:

Homework Statement


A child's playground swing is supported by chains that are 4.0m long. If the swing is 0.50m above the ground and moving at 6.0 m/s when the chains are vertical, what is the maximum height of the swing?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Back again.. this time I am LOST. I feel like this should be a circular motion type of problem, but that doesn't entirely make sense since I'm working on energy conservation, linear momentum, torque, and angular momentum. This is what I DO understand:

radius = 4.0m
vi = 6.0 m/s
vf = 0 m/s
The total height is whatever it is plus 0.50m.

I'm lost because I have no clue how to do the problem without a time component or a mass component or an angle. I understand that gravity plays a vertical role, slowing down the speed of the swing.
It may be easier in this case to consider conservation of energy rather than focusing on circular motion.
 
The conservation of energy should be sufficient to answer this problem.

You don't need mass or time. I am pretty sure it is assumed that the ground is flat, otherwise the problem wouldn't be solvable. In the case the ground is flat then you are given an angle which is 90 degrees when the swing as at the bottom of its swing.

The swing is at is maximum velocity when it is at the bottom of its swing (when its not moving upwards). Like you said the swing has no velocity at vf of this problem. This means that at this time it has transferred all of its kinetic energy into ...
 
Sorry, I had a dr. appointment...The kinetic energy was transferred into potential energy. This helps a bit, but I feel like I'm still missing something.

I know the change in potential energy is U = mgΔy; I don't know m, but I can figure Δy from the equation: Δy = vi^2 / 2g = (6.0 m/s)^2 / (2)(9.8 m/s) = 1.84 m. So am I just adding 1.84m + 0.50m = 2.34m ??

I feel like I'm missing something, otherwise why would the length of the swing chain (4.0m) be included?
 
ally1h said:
I know the change in potential energy is U = mgΔy; I don't know m, but I can figure Δy from the equation: Δy = vi^2 / 2g = (6.0 m/s)^2 / (2)(9.8 m/s) = 1.84 m. So am I just adding 1.84m + 0.50m = 2.34m ??
That's all there is to it. Realize that the equation you used is just an application of energy conservation.
I feel like I'm missing something, otherwise why would the length of the swing chain (4.0m) be included?
I can think of several reasons: (1) Just to see if you know what matters and what doesn't, or (2) The problem might have another part that will require the length of the swing. :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K