Max min, Lagrange's multiplier question

  • Thread starter Thread starter chy1013m1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
chy1013m1
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://www.individual.utoronto.ca/chy1013m1/a42.jpg

Homework Equations


possibly Lagrange's multiplier..

The Attempt at a Solution


treating S = f(x1, x2, ... , x2006) = x1 * 1^1/3 + x2 * 2^1/3 + ... + x2006 * 2006^1/3

and constrain G(x1, x2 ... x2006) = x1 ^ 3/2 + x2 ^ 3/2 + ... + x2006 ^ 3/2 - (2^1/2 / (2006^1/2 * 2007 ^ 1/2)) = 0

then solve G(x...) = 0
gradient(f) = lambda * gradient(G) , which isn't all that clear what to do next.. any hints ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It isn't clear what to do next? How about completing that equation:
[itex]\nabla S= \lambda \cdot \nabla G[/itex]? (S, not f)
What is [itex]\nabla S[/itex]? What is [itex]\nabla G[/itex]? That should give you 2007 linear equations for x1, x2, . . . , x2006 and [itex]\lambda[/itex]. Fortunately they are almost all separated and solving just a few should give you the general formula.