Eigenvalue problem -- Elastic deformation of a membrane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an eigenvalue problem related to the elastic deformation of a membrane represented in the x1x2-plane. The original poster seeks to determine the principal directions and factors of extension or contraction resulting from a transformation defined by a matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors from the transformation matrix. There is a focus on verifying algebraic steps and the correctness of results. Questions arise regarding the next steps after obtaining eigenvalues and eigenvectors, particularly how to apply these to the original circle equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively recalculating eigenvalues and eigenvectors, with some expressing confusion about the implications of their results. There is a recognition of the need to check work and clarify the relationship between eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and the deformation of the membrane. Guidance has been offered regarding the transformation of points on the unit circle based on the eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention discrepancies in their calculations and the importance of including a scaling factor in their results. There is an ongoing exploration of how to visualize the transformation of the unit circle into an ellipse based on the derived eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

shreddinglicks
Messages
225
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


An elastic membrane in the x1x2-plane with boundary circle x1^2 + x2^2 = 1 is stretched so that point P(x1,x2) goes over into point Q(y1,y2) such that y = Ax with A = 3/2* [2 1 ; 1 2] find the principal directions and the corresponding factors of extension or contraction of the elastic deformation. Sketch the shape of the deformed membrane.

Homework Equations


det(A-lambda*I) = 0
(A-lambda*I)x = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Using det(A-lambda*I) = 0
I got

lambda = 4.5
lambda = 0

Using (A-lambda*I)x = 0
I got eigenvectors

x2*[1;1]
x2*[-.5;1]

What do I do next?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
shreddinglicks said:

Homework Statement


An elastic membrane in the x1x2-plane with boundary circle x1^2 + x2^2 = 1 is stretched so that point P(x1,x2) goes over into point Q(y1,y2) such that y = Ax with A = 3/2* [2 1 ; 1 2] find the principal directions and the corresponding factors of extension or contraction of the elastic deformation. Sketch the shape of the deformed membrane.

Homework Equations


det(A-lambda*I) = 0
(A-lambda*I)x = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Using det(A-lambda*I) = 0
I got

lambda = 4.5
lambda = 0
Check your algebra. Both eigenvalues are incorrect.
shreddinglicks said:
Using (A-lambda*I)x = 0
I got eigenvectors

x2*[1;1]
x2*[-.5;1]
The first eigenvector is correct, although it appears that you got it by accident, not on purpose. The second one isn't correct.
shreddinglicks said:
What do I do next?
After you get the correct eigenvalues and eigenvectors, each eigenvalue will give the amount of stretch or compression in the direction of the associated eigenvector. That should give you some idea of how the circle will be deformed due to the transformation
 
Yes, it is incorrect. I recalculated.

lambda = 1.5 and 4.5

eigenvectors are:
x2*[-1 1]
x2*[1 1]

I'm confused about the next part. Am I plugging the eigenvalues into x2? Then Am I plugging the vectors into the circle equation x1^2 + x2^2 = 1?
 
shreddinglicks said:
Yes, it is incorrect. I recalculated.

lambda = 1.5 and 4.5
Those still aren't right. The eigenvalues I get are both integer values. It would be helpful if you showed more of your work, such as the characteristic equation you're working with.

It's a good idea to check your work. If ##\lambda_1## is an eigenvalue with associated eigenvector ##\vec{x_1}##, then ##A\vec{x_1} = \lambda_1\vec{x_1}## should be a true statement. IOW, applying the matrix to an eigenvector should result in a scalar multiple of that eigenvector -- a vector that is longer or shorter or possibly pointing the opposite direction (if the eigenvalue is negative).

I have checked both of my eigenvalues and eigenvectors as described above.
shreddinglicks said:
eigenvectors are:
x2*[-1 1]
x2*[1 1]
These are the eigenvectors I get, but I have no idea how you're getting them, as your eigenvalues are both wrong.
shreddinglicks said:
I'm confused about the next part. Am I plugging the eigenvalues into x2? Then Am I plugging the vectors into the circle equation x1^2 + x2^2 = 1?
The two directions of your eigenvectors define four points on the untransformed circle. Using the correct eigenvalues, the transformed points from the circle will be in the same direction as the eigenvectors, but pushed out or sucked in. The transformation should deform the circle into a rotated ellipse.
 
I checked my eigenvalues on MATLAB to be sure.

upload_2018-9-12_10-37-33.png

The hand calculation is also attached.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-9-12_10-37-33.png
    upload_2018-9-12_10-37-33.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 1,202
  • IMG_0362.jpg
    IMG_0362.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 640
Yes, multiplied by 3/2.
 
OK, my mistake. I wasn't using that factor of 3/2 in my calculations. Since both of your eigenvalues are positive, the points on the circle in the directions of your eigenvectors will be stretched out by factors of 1.5 and 4.5.
 
I want to understand this. So I have two answers.

One where

x2*[-1 1]' where x2 = 1.5

and the other answer is

x2*[1 1]' where x2 = 4.5

I plug each of these vectors into the circle equation and then plot?
 
The line in the direction of the vector <-1, 1> intersects the unit circle at ##(\frac{-\sqrt 2} 2, \frac{\sqrt 2} 2)## and at ##(\frac{\sqrt 2} 2, \frac{-\sqrt 2} 2)##. The transformation A will stretch these points out by a factor of 1.5 away from the origin. What are the coordinates of these two transformed points?
Do the same computations for the other eigenvector/eigenvalue pair.
Is that clear?
 
  • #10
Makes perfect sense. I just didn't think of the vectors as having an infinitely long line traveling through its direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K