salvestrom
- 226
- 0
ghwellsjr said:I think you have me mixed up with someone else. What post # is this in?
In post 22 you said that einstein removed the infinities in section 4.
The discussion centers on the concept of time dilation, specifically the minimum and maximum rates of time as influenced by speed and gravitational fields. It establishes that at the speed of light, time effectively has no meaning, while at rest in a negligible gravitational field, time ticks normally. The conversation highlights the complexities of comparing clocks in different frames of reference, emphasizing that time dilation is relative and cannot be universally ordered. The Lorentz factor is mentioned as a critical component in understanding time dilation, reinforcing that time is not absolute but rather dependent on the observer's frame of reference.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of time and its measurement in different gravitational and motion contexts.
ghwellsjr said:I think you have me mixed up with someone else. What post # is this in?
PAllen said:Actually, it was universally accepted from Galileo's time, except for a short, confusing period in the 1800s, before Einstein re-established Galileo's principle: you cannot distinguish a state of rest; all inertial frames are equivalent. However, this principle plus Maxwell's equations required some conceptual changes to space and time.
salvestrom said:I was referring to the notion of two observers relative to each other both observing the other as being slower.
PAllen said:Traveling 22 light seconds of Anthony's distance, Cleo will experience 1 second. Traveling 22 light second of Cleo's distance, Anthony will experience 1 second.
salvestrom said:Can you ellaborate please on "Anthoney's distance" and "Cleo's distance".