I Maximally entangled two-qubit Bell states

kaje
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hello,
In the four maximally entangled two-qubit Bell states, what is the difference between the first and the second states, similarly, the difference between the third and the fourth states. What the different in signs mean( +,-)
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/109a51fe05d9e48649bfb5a06ca5de616139ea2c
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/c6f4fa7ca90a435fdf6c68e123e081e5ea3226d6
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/baacb91e49575425e9ed235a5169ab84df8429f8
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/9cffbf1aab3f5b14a68f4efaaaee4388c9efc82e
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please do not use svg images. Do they not come out correctly.

I can anyway answer your question. You will notice that ##\Psi^\pm## and ##\Phi^\pm## differ by the sign between the two terms. This change of sign ensures orthogonality.
 
Thank you..

For instance, in phi state for both (+ and -), in the first term Alice would get 0 and Bob 0 as well for both (+,-). Actually, it is not clear in terms of definition and the way of measurement, as both look similar.

Thanks.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top