Maximize F with Maxima Problem: Constraints & Prove

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NaturePaper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxima
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on maximizing the function F defined as F=z_1cos(θ_1)cos(θ_2)+z_2(e^(iα_1)sin(θ_1)cos(θ_2)+e^(iα_2)cos(θ_1)sin(θ_2))+z_3e^(i(α_1+α_2))sin(θ_1)sin(θ_2) under the constraints 0≤α_i≤π and 0≤θ_i≤π/2. The participants conclude that the maximum |F| is bounded by N, and they explore the necessity of setting θ_1=θ_2 and α_1=α_2 to achieve this maximum. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proving these conditions to optimize |F| effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Knowledge of optimization techniques in mathematical functions
  • Experience with constraints in mathematical optimization problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for proving optimization conditions in complex functions
  • Study the implications of equal arguments in complex number summation
  • Explore boundedness in mathematical functions and its proofs
  • Learn about optimization techniques specific to trigonometric functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in optimization problems involving complex functions and trigonometric identities.

NaturePaper
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Let

[tex] F=z_1\cos\theta_1\cos\theta_2+z_2(e^{i\alpha_1}\sin\theta_1\cos\theta_2+e^{i\alpha_2}\cos\theta_1\sin\theta_2)+z_3e^{i(\alpha_1+\alpha_2)}\sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2[/tex]

where [tex]0\le\alpha_i\le\pi,~0\le\theta_i\le\pi/2[/tex] and [tex]z_i[/tex]
are some fixed complex numbers.

Then how to find
[tex]\max_{\theta_i, \alpha_i}|F|[/tex]

We note that [tex]|F|\le1[/tex].

Particularly, I want to know if there is any set of constraints like the case of optimization over real variables. [I know definitely that the conditions are [tex]\theta_1=\theta_2; \alpha_1=\alpha_2[/tex]. But I have to establish it. So, how to prove it?]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NaturePaper said:
Let
We note that [tex]|F|\le1[/tex].
Particularly, I want to know if there is any set of constraints like the case of optimization over real variables. [I know definitely that the conditions are [tex]\theta_1=\theta_2; \alpha_1=\alpha_2[/tex]. But I have to establish it. So, how to prove it?]

Some corrections, [tex]|F|\le1[/tex]
should be [tex]|F|\le N \mbox{ i.e., $|F|$ is bounded}[/tex].

I was trying to use the observation

[tex]\max|\sum z_i|=\sum|z_i|[/tex]
occurs iff [tex]z_i[/tex]s have equal argument. But for my case, since [tex]z_i[/tex]s
are arbitrary, I can't drive out some common phase to get the maximum as [tex]\sum|z_i|[/tex]. So. for generic [tex]z_i,~~|F|[/tex] should depend on [tex]\alpha_i[/tex]s.

In light of these observations, my precise questions are:

1. Can we choose [tex]\theta_1=\theta_2[/tex] to get max|F|?
2. Can we choose [tex]\alpha_1=\alpha_2[/tex] too ?
3. Is the conditions 1. and 2. are necessary to get |F|?
4. How?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K