Maximize Fencing for 4 Equal Pastures - 125,000 Linear Feet

  • Thread starter Thread starter opus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The rancher has 125,000 linear feet of fencing to enclose a rectangular field divided into four equal pastures. The optimal dimensions for each pasture are determined to be 12,500 feet for one side and 7,812.5 feet for the other side. The confusion arose from the interpretation of the area equation, where the correct formulation should reflect the total area of the four pastures without incorrectly multiplying dimensions. The final dimensions maximize the area while adhering to the fencing constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometry and area calculations
  • Familiarity with algebraic equations and manipulation
  • Knowledge of optimization techniques in mathematics
  • Ability to interpret and apply constraints in problem-solving
NEXT STEPS
  • Study optimization problems in calculus, focusing on constrained optimization
  • Learn about the method of Lagrange multipliers for maximizing areas
  • Explore geometric properties of rectangles and their area calculations
  • Review algebraic manipulation techniques to avoid common pitfalls in equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone involved in optimization problems, particularly in agricultural planning or land management.

opus
Gold Member
Messages
717
Reaction score
131

Homework Statement


A rancher has 125,000 linear feet of fencing and wants to enclose a rectangular field and then divide it into four equal pastures with three internal fences parallel to one of the rectangular sides. What are the dimensions for each of the four equal pastures that will maximize the area of each pasture?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Please see attached work. According to the back of the book, the dimension of 12,500 (green checkmark) is correct. But when I plug this value into the original equation to find the other dimension, I am getting an incorrect solution. Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-01-04 at 7.29.14 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-01-04 at 7.29.14 PM.png
    30.5 KB · Views: 355
Physics news on Phys.org
Under your step 1a, you had A = wl

Under step, 1b, you have 4A = wl. Obviously, it should be 4A = 4wl

OK?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: opus
By multiplying a single side of the equation by 4, I understand that I changed the actual value of the equation. However, my reasoning is that I'm looking for 4 separate areas, each having ##(w)(l)##. So why the 4 on the RHS as well? I feel like that makes the dimensions 4 times larger than what they should be.
 
A represents the area of one rectangle. You have 4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: opus
Yes which is why I have the 4 on the left. But wouldn't having the 4 on the right throw the dimensions of ##w## and ##l## off?
 
The question was:

opus said:
What are the dimensions for each of the four equal pastures that will maximize the area of each pasture?
But you gave the length of the big rectangle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: opus
Ohh I see. Thank you guys. Then the second part should be 7812.5 ft.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
20K