Maximizing Output Power in DIY CNC Laser Cutters

  • Thread starter Thread starter theycallmevirgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Laser
AI Thread Summary
Improving DIY CNC laser cutters may involve adding extra travel for the laser or stationary mirrors, which can impact output power. A rule of thumb indicates that uncoated plane glass loses about 4% of power at each air/glass interface, making mirrors a preferable choice for high-power lasers. Using anti-reflective coatings can enhance efficiency, while front-surface mirrors, though effective, can be costly and challenging to maintain. Adjustments to the focal point may be necessary when altering beam distance through air. Overall, optimizing optics and mirror use is essential for maximizing output power in these systems.
theycallmevirgo
Messages
108
Reaction score
25
TL;DR Summary
How many additional mirrors and/or additional distance can I have in a laser assembly before I start seeing power losses?
I was thinking of an improvement to the "traditional" diy cnc laser cutter that might entail some extra travel for the laser and/or additional (stationary) mirrors. Is there some way to calculate how this will affect output power?

Many thanks in advance

Joe
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Rule-of Thumb:
Using plane glass (uncoated), you lose about 4% at each air/glass interface.

That's why high power Lasers us mirrors instead of lenses, that 4% cracks the lenses.

You can do much better if using an Anti-Reflective coating for the specific light wavelength. Front-surface mirrors are a good option, but those can be pricey and difficut to clean without damage.

Beam distance thru air shouldn't be a major problem in itself, but you may have to adjust the focal point of the beam by modifying the optics.

Have Fun!
Tom
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top