Maximizing volume of a Square-Based Pyramid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sidnygte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pyramid Volume
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on maximizing the volume of a square-based pyramid constructed from an 8-inch by 8-inch piece of paper. The formula for volume, V = 1/3 * x^2 * h, is explored, with participants attempting to express height (h) in terms of the base length (x). There are corrections regarding the slant length and the relationship between height and base dimensions, with emphasis on proper mathematical expressions. Participants clarify the use of square roots and the implications of algebraic manipulation in the context of the problem. The conversation highlights the complexity of optimization in geometry, particularly in deriving the correct volume function.
sidnygte
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given an 8in x 8 in piece of paper and I need to build a pyramid with a square base with the greatest volume.

Homework Equations


V = 1/3 * x^2 * h

b = base length
h = height length

I'm trying to get everything in terms of x, which is the length of the base of the square I need to make.

The slant length is l

w(length of the entire slant) = 2l + xhttp://i39.tinypic.com/2me4jsw.jpg

Oh and l = h^2 + x^2/2. height squared + one half x^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



This is an optimization problem, so I put everything in terms of one variable, and then get the derivative
I just don't know if this is the derivative.

http://i44.tinypic.com/2rh07f5.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Sydneygte,


sidnygte said:
The slant length is l

w(length of the entire slant) = 2l + x


http://i39.tinypic.com/2me4jsw.jpg

Oh and l = h^2 + x^2/2. height squared + one half x^2.

You made a little mistake: It should be (x/2)^2 instead of x^2/2.
Also, type in the expression of the volume in terms of x and its derivative. You picture is not clear.

ehild
 
ohh that changes it a bit

so h^2 = l^2 - (x/2)^2

so you can square root everything so

h = l - (x/2)? that doesn't seem right
 
sidnygte said:
ohh that changes it a bit

so h^2 = l^2 - (x/2)^2

so you can square root everything so

h = l - (x/2)? that doesn't seem right
If square roots worked like that, Pythagoras would have been out of business long ago.

Square roots don't work like that.

After all,
9 = 25 - 16 .​
But:
3 ≠ 5 - 4 .​
 
so what would the equation look like if you were trying to get H to the power of one?

h = sqrt(l^2 - .5x^2)?
 
sidnygte said:
so what would the equation look like if you were trying to get H to the power of one?

h = sqrt(l^2 - .5x^2)?
It would be:
h = sqrt( l2 - (0.5x)2 )
or equivalently
h = sqrt( l2 - (0.25)x2 )
(That is a lower case L, not a number 1.)
 
so then the function in terms of x would be

V = 1/3X^2 * sqrt( sqrt(128)-x)^2 - (0.5x)^2) ?

that seems confusing haha. has would I simplify the double square root? Since it is being squared in the inside can I make it into

V = 1/3X^2 * sqrt(128 - X^2 - 0.25X^2)?
 
You can't do that either .

(a-b)2 ≠ a2 - b2 .

But the following is true:

(a-b)2 = a2 -2ab + b2

You will still have a square root if you "FOIL" ( sqrt(128)-x)2.

BTW, √(128) = (8)√(2), and either way you write this, it's just a number, there's no variable involved.

Also , you are missing a parenthesis in " sqrt( sqrt(128)-x)^2 - (0.5x)^2) ".

It should be: sqrt( ( sqrt(128)-x)^2 - (0.5x)^2) .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K