Using calculus to derive the volume of a pyramid

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the volume of a pyramid using calculus. Participants explore various approaches to set up the problem, focusing on integrating over specific dimensions and considering the geometry of the pyramid.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss calculating the volume by integrating over a quarter of the pyramid in the first octant and then multiplying the result. Others question the choice of the plane used for integration and suggest alternative methods, such as considering slices of the pyramid at different heights.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the integration setup. Some express confusion about the original poster's logic, while others suggest simpler methods. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple interpretations and approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential complexity of the problem and the assumptions made regarding the symmetry of the pyramid. There is also mention of the absence of certain geometric considerations, such as the area of a triangle, in the original calculations.

e^(i Pi)+1=0
Messages
246
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Use calculus to derive the volume of a pyramid

The Attempt at a Solution



There's probably a simpler way to go about this, but I wanted a challenge. I decided to calculate 1/4 of the pyramid in the first octant and then multiply my final answer by 4.

First we have a pyramid of height h, length L and width w, (measuring from the origin) so the corners are at (0,0,h), (L,0,0) and (0,w,0).

Calculating the plane that defines this quarter of the pyramid yields

whx+lhy+lw(z-h)=0 so z=h-\frac{hx}{l}-\frac{hy}{w}

We integrate this over dy from 0 to y=\frac{-wx}{l}+w which is the diagonal line the pyramid would make in octant one when looking straight down and then over dx from 0 to L.

Multiply this answer by 4 and we get \frac{2hwl}{3}, so it comes out double for some reason? :cry:

Thanks for looking.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
e^(i Pi)+1=0 said:

Homework Statement



Use calculus to derive the volume of a pyramid

The Attempt at a Solution



There's probably a simpler way to go about this, but I wanted a challenge. I decided to calculate 1/4 of the pyramid in the first octant and then multiply my final answer by 4.

First we have a pyramid of height h, length L and width w, (measuring from the origin) so the corners are at (0,0,h), (L,0,0) and (0,w,0).

Calculating the plane that defines this quarter of the pyramid yields
What do you mean by this? What plane? You can, in fact, use a number of different planes. Planes parallel to the three coordinate planes are the obvious ones.
Taking z= z_0 we would, by "similar triangles" have \frac{x}{l}= \frac{y}{w}= \frac{z_0}{h} so that we integrate with respect to z from 0 to h and, for each z, with respect to x from 0 to \frac{lz}{h} and with respect to y from 0 to \frac{wz}{h}

whx+lhy+lw(z-h)=0 so z=h-\frac{hx}{l}-\frac{hy}{w}

We integrate this over dy from 0 to y=\frac{-wx}{l}+w which is the diagonal line the pyramid would make in octant one when looking straight down and then over dx from 0 to L.

Multiply this answer by 4 and we get \frac{2hwl}{3}, so it comes out double for some reason? :cry:

Thanks for looking.
 
"What plane?"

As I thought I made clear, the plane defining the surface of the pyramid in the first octant.
 
With respect, I think you are making this unnecessarily difficult, and you are calculating only for a symmetrical pyramid. Imagine any pointy thing with straight edges between base and top, with a base area 'A' in the xy plane, and height h. Then consider a parallel plane thickness dz, at height z. Calculate the volume of the slice, and then integrate between o and h.
 
Didn't follow the logic in the OP completely, but I notice the absence of a step where the area of a triangle is involved. That's where the 1/2 should come from.
 
pongo38 said:
With respect, I think you are making this unnecessarily difficult, and you are calculating only for a symmetrical pyramid. Imagine any pointy thing with straight edges between base and top, with a base area 'A' in the xy plane, and height h. Then consider a parallel plane thickness dz, at height z. Calculate the volume of the slice, and then integrate between o and h.

What made you think I'm calculating only for a symmetrical pyramid?
 
haruspex said:
Didn't follow the logic in the OP completely, but I notice the absence of a step where the area of a triangle is involved. That's where the 1/2 should come from.

That would be nice, but I'm fairly sure that's not it as the double integral accounts for the area of the triangle. I did it twice and got the same answer so I'm fairly certain it's not an algebra mistake. Hopefully this will make things clearer:

G5GwXw0.jpg
 
e^(i Pi)+1=0 said:
That would be nice, but I'm fairly sure that's not it as the double integral accounts for the area of the triangle. I did it twice and got the same answer so I'm fairly certain it's not an algebra mistake. Hopefully this will make things clearer:

G5GwXw0.jpg

The integrand is only valid for z=0. If you think I've misunderstood, pls write out in more detail how you're carving up the pyramid for the purpose of integration.
 
You're not solving the problem you think you are. You found the volume of a pyramid where the diagonals of the base are length 2L and 2w. The area of the base is 4(wL/2) = 2wL, and to get the volume, you'd multiply the area of the base by h/3, which yields the same result as what you got.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
vela said:
You're not solving the problem you think you are. You found the volume of a pyramid where the diagonals of the base are length 2L and 2w. The area of the base is 4(wL/2) = 2wL, and to get the volume, you'd multiply the area of the base by h/3, which yields the same result as what you got.


Of course! Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K