Maximum - Can this be solved algebraically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter turdferguson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding the absolute extrema of the function f(x) = e^-x * ln(lnx). The user successfully derived the first derivative and identified a critical point at approximately x = 3.5, but struggled to isolate x algebraically from the equation 1/(xlnx) - ln(lnx) = 0. It was concluded that numerical methods, specifically Newton's Method, are necessary for solving this problem without graphing utilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives and critical points.
  • Familiarity with the function e^-x and its properties.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions, particularly ln(lnx).
  • Experience with numerical methods, especially Newton's Method.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's Method for finding roots of equations.
  • Explore the properties and applications of logarithmic functions in calculus.
  • Learn about the behavior of exponential functions and their derivatives.
  • Investigate alternative numerical methods for solving equations, such as the bisection method.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in numerical methods, and anyone seeking to understand the behavior of complex functions and their extrema.

turdferguson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the absolute extrema of f(x) = e^-x * ln(lnx)

The Attempt at a Solution


Ive successfully taken the first derivative and set it to zero. The problem is checking the sign of 1/(xlnx) - ln(lnx)

No matter how I try to manipulate this, I can't seem to isolate x. Its clear with a graphing calculator that f' changes from positive to negative at about 3.5, but this is supposed to be done without a graphing utility (if I could use one in my answer, I might as well have found the maximum from the start by graphing). Can this be set to zero and solved without a calculator?

Other forms include
1 - x*lnx*ln(lnx) = 0
lnx^(xlnx) - e = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, I don't think you can solve that without using numerical methods, such as a graphing calculator.
 
I found out today that we were supposed to use Newtons Method with a scientific calculator
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K