Solve f'(x) = 0: Why is There No Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nesan
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
nesan
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=((1+/+x)+++2)+/+(3(2x+++lnx))^(2/3)+=+0



Solve the equation f'(x) = 0

f(x) = (ln x + 2x)^(1/3)


The Attempt at a Solution



As you can see, for the function

((1 / x) + 2) / (3(2x + lnx))^(2/3) = 0

I can get a value for x which is - 1 / 2

But my textbook says "no solution"

Why is that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nesan said:

Homework Statement



http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=((1+/+x)+++2)+/+(3(2x+++lnx))^(2/3)+=+0



Solve the equation f'(x) = 0

f(x) = (ln x + 2x)^(1/3)


The Attempt at a Solution



As you can see, for the function

((1 / x) + 2) / (3(2x + lnx))^(2/3) = 0

I can get a value for x which is - 1 / 2

But my textbook says "no solution"

Why is that?

x must be positive in order for ln(x) to be defined.
 
Mark44 said:
x must be positive in order for ln(x) to be defined.

Oh wow, I totally missed that. Thank you very much. :)
 
That does not mean that wolfram alpha is wrong however. Wolfram alpha uses a definition of the logarithm which is also defined for negative numbers. This definition uses complex numbers.

However, you likely did not encounter complex numbers and complex logarithms yet, so in your problem x=-1/2 is not a valid solution as the logarithm is not well-defined.

This is a bit the danger of using computer software. Their solutions are not wrong, but they can be different solutions from what you want.