Maximum displacement from equilibrium of the mass as it osciallates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mass-spring system undergoing simple harmonic motion. The original poster presents a scenario involving a mass of 0.1 kg attached to a spring with a spring constant of 10 N/m, oscillating on a frictionless surface. The problem focuses on determining the maximum displacement from equilibrium based on given speed and displacement values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the maximum displacement using a derived formula involving angular frequency and current displacement. Some participants question the algebraic manipulation of the equations used, while others suggest considering energy conservation principles as an alternative approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen participants providing feedback on the original poster's method and suggesting alternative perspectives. There is acknowledgment of the correctness of the original approach, alongside hints towards energy conservation methods. The original poster reports achieving a result after considering the feedback.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential algebraic errors and the appropriateness of different formulas for the problem at hand. There is a mention of the importance of squaring the angular frequency in the calculations, indicating a focus on precision in mathematical expressions.

Reema
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A mass of 0.1 kg connected to a spring with a spring constant 10 N/M oscillates horizontally on frictionless table. The speed of the mass is 3.0 m/s when the displacement is 0.2 m form its equilibrium position.

What is the maximum displacement from equilibrium of the mass as it oscillates?

So ... the answer is 0.361m, but I did it one hundered times and I always get 0.969


First I found the frequency
009260845b0c28a45944ba1dc72179c5.png


I got 1.59 HZ so w= 9.99

then I used V= w ( √ A^2 - X^2 )



A^2= v^2/w + X^2

= 3^2 / 9.99 + o.2^2

A^2 = 0.94

A= 0.969m



 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method seems right to me. Check your algebra, though.
 
Thanks Leveret

do you think that there is something wrong with this equation A^2=( v^2/w) + X^2
because I thought it might be A^2=( v^2/w^2) + X^2 ?
 
Try looking at it from an energy conservation perspective.

are you aware of that formula?

its a much simpler method
 
dou you mean (PE = KE )
 
Last edited:
actually for simple harmonic motion (oscillation) there is a particular formula.
the formula is:

(1/2)kA^2 = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)kx^2

where (1/2)kA^2 is the total enegy, (1/2)kx^2 is the potential energy and (1/2)mv^2 is the kinetic energy

rearrange and you should be sweet :)also your method is correct ( in fact your equations are derived from the one i gave you). your mistake was you didnt square the omega
 
Last edited:
Wow .. Finally I got 0.36 :D

thaaaaaanks a lot
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K