Maximum likelihood estimator of binominal distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the binomial distribution, specifically the likelihood function L(x_1,...,x_n;p) = Π_{i=1}^{n}(n choose x_i) p^{x_i}(1-p)^{n-x_i}. A participant questions the omission of the product symbol (Π) in the likelihood function, which is essential for representing the joint probability of independent Bernoulli trials. The confusion arises from the notation used, where 'x' is incorrectly presented as a single variable instead of the vector of observed successes x_i. The primary goal is to estimate the parameter p, the probability of success in a Bernoulli trial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binomial distribution and Bernoulli trials
  • Familiarity with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)
  • Knowledge of statistical notation and functions
  • Basic proficiency in probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the likelihood function for binomial distributions
  • Learn about the implications of omitting the product symbol in likelihood functions
  • Explore the concept of maximum likelihood estimation in depth
  • Review statistical notation and its importance in probability theory
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and students studying probability and statistics who are looking to deepen their understanding of maximum likelihood estimation and binomial distributions.

superwolf
Messages
179
Reaction score
0
[tex] L(x_1,...,x_n;p)=\Pi_{i=1}^{n}(\stackrel{n}{x_i}) p^{x_i}(1-p)^{n-x_i}[/tex]

Correct so far?

The solution tells me to skip the [tex]\Pi[/tex]:

[tex] L(x_1,...,x_n;p)=(\stackrel{n}{x}) p^{x}(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

This is contradictory to all the examples in my book. Why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand why you wrote L(x1...xn,p). I thought the purpose was to estimate p, the probability of a designated success outcome in a Bernoulli trial. So it should be L (p) as p is the only parameter.

I also don't see any sense in omitting the multiplicative pi symbol. What is x here, anyway? x_i all refer to the observed no. of succeses of each sample size n. So what is x?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K