Maximum position expectation value for 1D harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on maximizing the expectation value \(\langle x \rangle\) for a linear combination of states \(|0\rangle\) and \(|1\rangle\) in a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. The participants utilize the Lagrange multiplier method to derive coefficients \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) that maximize the expectation value under the normalization constraint \(c_1^*c_1 + c_2^*c_2 = 1\). The final solutions yield multiple valid sets of coefficients, differing only by a phase factor, confirming the inherent freedom in quantum state representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically harmonic oscillators
  • Familiarity with expectation values in quantum states
  • Knowledge of Lagrange multipliers for optimization problems
  • Basic concepts of quantum state normalization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrange multipliers in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of quantum states and their phase factors
  • Learn about expectation values in quantum mechanics, focusing on harmonic oscillators
  • Investigate the implications of state normalization in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those working on harmonic oscillators and optimization problems in quantum states.

AwesomeTrains
Messages
115
Reaction score
3
Hey, I'm stuck halfway through the solution it seems. I could use some tips on how to continue.

1. Homework Statement

I have to determine a linear combination of the states |0\rangle, |1\rangle, of a one dimensional harmonic oscillator, so that the expectation value \langle x \rangle is a maximum.

Homework Equations


x=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(a+a^\dagger)

The Attempt at a Solution


I set |\alpha \rangle\equiv c_1|1\rangle + c_2|0\rangle
Then I calculate \langle \alpha | x | \alpha \rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}} (c_1^*\langle1| + c_2^*\langle 0|)(a+a^\dagger)(c_1|1\rangle + c_2|0\rangle)=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}[c_1^*(c_1+c_2)+c_2^*c_2] = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}[1+c_1^*c_2]
I get the last equation because of the normalization condition:
c_1^*c_1+c_2^*c_2=1
This is where I don't know how to continue. Is this even the right approach?
(I'm not allowed to use the wave functions.)

Anything is appreciated.

Kind regards
Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should recheck your calculation of ##\langle \alpha \lvert x \rvert \alpha \rangle##. The ##c_i^*c_i## terms shouldn't be there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77
As for the maximization problem, the Lagrange multiplier method may be helpful.
 
Thanks for the fast reply.
I've corrected my calculation, is this right?:
First I calculate (a+a^\dagger)|\alpha\rangle
a(c_1|1\rangle+c_2|0\rangle)=c_1|0\rangle+0c_2|0\rangle=c_1|0\rangle
and
a^\dagger(c_1|1\rangle+c_2|0\rangle)=c_1\sqrt{2}|2\rangle+c_2|1\rangle

Then because |\alpha\rangle^\dagger = c_1^*\langle1|+c_2^*\langle0|
\langle\alpha|(a+a^\dagger)|\alpha\rangle=c_1^*\langle1|(c_1\sqrt{2}|2\rangle+c_2|1\rangle+c_1|0\rangle)+c_2^*\langle0|(c_1\sqrt{2}|2\rangle+c_2|1\rangle+c_1|0\rangle)= c_1^*c_2+c_2^*c_1
Do I use the lagrange multiplier method here? Or how do I continue?
 
The Lagrange multiplier is used for finding the maximum value of <x>.
 
So It's like a function of 4 variables f(c_1,c_1^*, c_2,c_2^*)=c_1^*c_2+c_2^*c_1 which I have to maximize under the condition c_1^*c_1+c_2^*c_2=1
Or is there an easier solution?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77
Hello! I Have the same exercise in my homework. Using the Lagrange multiplier I get ##c_{1}=c_{2}=1/\sqrt{2}##. Is that right?
 
AwesomeTrains said:
So It's like a function of 4 variables f(c_1,c_1^*, c_2,c_2^*)=c_1^*c_2+c_2^*c_1 which I have to maximize under the condition c_1^*c_1+c_2^*c_2=1
Or is there an easier solution?
Yes, it is.
Mikhail_MR said:
Hello! I Have the same exercise in my homework. Using the Lagrange multiplier I get ##c_{1}=c_{2}=1/\sqrt{2}##. Is that right?
Whether it's true or not, you can do some kind of examination. For example, you can write ##\langle \hat{x} \rangle \propto |c_1||c_2| \cos{(\phi_1-\phi_2)}## where the ##\phi##'s are the angle of each coefficients, since we want to maximize our expectation value, it's necessary that ##\phi_1=\phi_2##.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for advise, blue_leaf77. I have made my calculation new.
I get 4 different sets of values.
##c_{1}=c_{2} = i/\sqrt{2}##
##c_{1}=c_{2} = -i/\sqrt{2}##
##c_{1}=i/\sqrt{2}; c_{2} = -i/\sqrt{2}##
##c_{1}=-i/\sqrt{2}; c_{2} = i/\sqrt{2}##

Using your advise how to examine solutions only the first and the second solutions are of interest. I can get this result on another way just inserting values in ##f## and finding a maximum. My question is: how i decide which set is right (the first or the second)?
 
  • #10
Mikhail_MR said:
Thanks for advise, blue_leaf77. I have made my calculation new.
I get 4 different sets of values.
##c_{1}=c_{2} = i/\sqrt{2}##
##c_{1}=c_{2} = -i/\sqrt{2}##
##c_{1}=i/\sqrt{2}; c_{2} = -i/\sqrt{2}##
##c_{1}=-i/\sqrt{2}; c_{2} = i/\sqrt{2}##
Well as long as ##\phi_1 = \phi_2## is satisfied, any ##\phi_1## is possible.
Mikhail_MR said:
how i decide which set is right (the first or the second)?
In the original question posted by the OP, he is asked to calculate the maximum of ##\langle \hat{x} \rangle##. In your case, I don't know what you are asked to do in your own homework.
 
  • #11
I have to calculate the maximum of ##\langle \hat{x} \rangle## too
 
  • #12
blue_leaf77 said:
Well as long as ##\phi_1 = \phi_2## is satisfied, any ##\phi_1## is possible.
You have this freedom.
 
  • #13
Mikhail_MR said:
Thanks for advise, blue_leaf77. I have made my calculation new.
I get 4 different sets of values.
##c_{1}=c_{2} = i/\sqrt{2}##
##c_{1}=c_{2} = -i/\sqrt{2}##

Using your advise how to examine solutions only the first and the second solutions are of interest. I can get this result on another way just inserting values in ##f## and finding a maximum. My question is: how i decide which set is right (the first or the second)?
Your first solution corresponds to the state
$$\lvert \alpha_1 \rangle = i\left(\frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 0 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 1 \rangle\right) = e^{i\frac {\pi}{2}}\left(\frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 0 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 1 \rangle\right),$$ and your second solution to
$$\lvert \alpha_2 \rangle = -i\left(\frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 0 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 1 \rangle\right) = e^{-i\frac {\pi}{2}}\left(\frac {1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 0 \rangle + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \lvert 1 \rangle\right).$$ The two states differ only by an overall phase factor, so…
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mikhail_MR

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K