Maximum Volume of a Box: How to Optimize Cardboard Usage for Chocolate Boxes

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the volume of an open-topped box made from 5 × 14-inch cardboard rectangles by cutting squares from the corners. The volume function is defined as V(x) = x(14-2x)(5-2x), leading to a derivative equation for critical points. Two critical values, 1.11 and 5.21, are found, but there is uncertainty about their validity in the context of the volume function. The importance of checking these values in the original volume equation is emphasized to determine which, if any, yield a maximum volume. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need to validate critical points to ensure they are applicable for maximizing the box's volume.
zeezey
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Chocolate Box Company is going to make open-topped boxes out of 5 × 14-inch rectangles of cardboard by cutting squares out of the corners and folding up the sides. What is the largest volume box it can make this way? (Round your answer to the nearest tenth.)



Homework Equations


V = length * width * height


The Attempt at a Solution


V(x) = x(14-2x)(5-2x)
=70x-38x^2+4x^3

d/vx = 12x^2 - 76x + 70
12x^2 - 76x +70 = 0
= 1.11 and 5.21
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, you didn't round to the nearest tenth. :wink:

Second, are you sure that both answers are valid? What happens if you plug in those values for x in
V(x) = x(14-2x)(5-2x)?
 
What am I supposed to get if I plug those numbers into that equation? Those points are valid if I plug them into the derivative equation I found. Is my derivative wrong ?
 
Your answers are not wrong, but not all answers may be valid. So you tell us: find V(1.11) and V(5.21), and note their signs.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K