MCNP6.2: F6:N and F6:P tallies vs +F6 tallies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19matthew89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    sd
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison of tallies in MODE:N P, specifically whether +F6 equals F6:N plus F6:P. It was clarified that the role of the SD card affects the tallies, and using SD=1 for F6:N, F6:P, and +F6 yielded the expected results. The initial discrepancy was attributed to inconsistent SD usage across the tallies. Additionally, the normalization of F6 tallies is based on mass, which is calculated as volume multiplied by density. Overall, the issue was resolved by understanding the impact of the SD card on the tallies.
19matthew89
Messages
46
Reaction score
12
TL;DR Summary
In case of MODE:N P, is +F6=F6:N+F6:P
Hi,

I am checking whether, in case of a MODE:N P, tallies can be compared.
In theory, is +F6=F6:N+F6:P? If so, my numbers do not add up.

But maybe it's due to the role of SD card, so here there is an aside question: how does SD card affect the F6 tallies? Is it exactly like for F4 and F2? For instance, for F4, is the value of the tally without SD equal to the values of the tally with SD * (values of SD/volume)?

Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Whatever the SD card does to +F6 should be the same for F6:N or F6:P.

The manual describes +F6 as "collision" and F6 as "track length." There is some description of these in the theory manual. Presumably they will converge for large numbers of particles. Do your numbers match within the statistical error estimate?
 
Grelbr42 said:
Whatever the SD card does to +F6 should be the same for F6:N or F6:P.

The manual describes +F6 as "collision" and F6 as "track length." There is some description of these in the theory manual. Presumably they will converge for large numbers of particles. Do your numbers match within the statistical error estimate?
Hi! Thanks.

I have actually checked and using SD= 1 for F6:N, F6:P and +F6 gives exactly the result I was expecting, namely +F6=F6:N+F6:P.

So I guess that the discrepancy I had found when I had used SD for +F6 but not for F6:P and F6:N had to do with what SD actually does.
 
EDIT: solved

The normalization of F6 tallies is to the
mass=volume*rho
where rho is the density used in defining the cell.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top