MCNP6.2 - SDEF on a RCC surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19matthew89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder Surface
Click For Summary
Setting up a surface neutron source on a cylindrical macrobody in MCNP6.2 can lead to a "fatal error: sdef surface not valid surface" if the surface is not correctly defined. The issue may stem from an incorrect input file or surface definition. It is confirmed that defining a surface source on a cylindrical surface is possible, so verifying the input details is essential. Running a simple test case may help identify the problem. For further assistance, consider reaching out to the MCNP6.2 user community or developers.
19matthew89
Messages
46
Reaction score
12
TL;DR
Error for SDEF source on RCC surface
Hi everyone,

I'm trying to set up a surface neutron source on the surface of a cylinder defined as a macrobody (RCC) and used also to define cell of the system. My aim is setting up a surface source where I'd like to give a specific spectrum (and DIR) at each surface defining the cylinder.

But, before getting so far, I simply tried to set up a monoenergetic source on the surface of the macrobody (see attachment). Unfortunately, the code gives me this fatal error: "fatal error sdef surface not valid surface" and I don't manage to understand why. In fact, the simulation runs smoothly if I simply replace the cylinder surface with a spherical surface. Aren't you allowed to define a surface source on a cylindrical surface? can you spot what the issue could be?Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
for your help!

Hi there,

It is possible to define a surface source on a cylindrical surface in MCNP6.2. The error you are receiving may be due to an incorrect definition of the surface or a problem with your input file. I suggest double-checking your input file and making sure the surface is correctly defined as an RCC macrobody. You may also want to try running a simple test case with a monoenergetic source on a cylindrical surface to see if the issue persists.

If the problem persists, you can also try reaching out to the MCNP6.2 user community for assistance or contacting the developers for further support. They may be able to provide more specific guidance on troubleshooting this issue.

I hope this helps, and good luck with your simulation!
 
I'd like to start a discussion/debate of nuclear power for the purpose of informing people about it. I am participating in a thread in another forum http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=9370 where we are discussing an article about Germany planning to phase out nuclear power. I am STRONGLY against this. It is bad for scientific, economic, political, and environmental reasons. In the course of discussions of the nuclear power issue, it seems to me that the arguements...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K