MCNP6: Getting a "10 particles got lost" error

AI Thread Summary
The "10 particles got lost" error in MCNP6 is often linked to geometry or surface definitions, particularly in the context of a 3x3 fuel lattice surrounded by coolant. Key issues identified include improperly defined cell boundaries and incorrect fill specifications, which can lead to unassigned volumes in the geometry. Adjustments made to the cell definitions and lattice specifications were necessary, including ensuring that the z limits were correctly applied. The use of mcplot helped visualize the geometry and identify discrepancies, ultimately leading to a resolution of the error. The discussion concluded with successful adjustments that allowed the model to run correctly.
a1234
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
MCNP6 gives me a "10 particles got lost" error when I try to run the attached input file modeling a 3x3 fuel lattice surrounded in coolant. As I understand it, this error is usually related to the geometry/surface definitions of each component, but I'm unsure of what the source of the error is. The output file says "there appears to be no cell on the other side of the surface from cell 11 at that point," which makes me think the issue stems from the way the lattice was defined.

I'd appreciate it if somebody could help me figure out the source of the issue, or perhaps help me interpret the output file. Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
a1234 said:
when I try to run the attached input file
I'm not seeing any file attachment. Maybe the format of the file is preventing it from uploading. If so, change the suffix to ".txt" to upload it, and mention what the suffix should be changed back to in order to run it.
 
  • Informative
Likes Oldman too and Alex A
The Geometry.txt file extension should be changed to .i to run it in MCNP.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes berkeman
In universe 2, the outside of the cladding isn't defined as a cell. ie +(surface)4. Fixing this does not fix everything, but it does help.

Your last line for the fill is 31113 instead of 33333. I don't understand lattices, is this correct? (changing it does not seem to help)

I'll take another look tomorrow.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
Redefined cell 11 as being +4 and being material 3 (coolant), but still getting the same error.
Yes, the last line in the fill should have been 3 3 3 3 3.
 
In this, cell 11 is still the lattice cell. I just made a new cell number for the missing volume.

Ok, mcplot to the rescue. Running with ipz on the command line let's us click to see a default plot in the interactive viewer. We can then click on an area to see what cell it's defined as. The command "pz 0" then shows us a slice. The is immediately wrong, there are only two fuel rods. When you specified the lattice you put the z's first. The right thing to do is probably be to not specify z limits in cell 11 at all, it's a 2D lattice. I see examples in the manual that do this so I think this is, at worst, fine. I then put the z limits into the cell being filled. This was helpful, not a total fix, I'm not 100% it isn't just a mcplot issue.

Next we have the problem that the 5x5 lattice isn't big enough to fill the volume you've told it to fill. This means there is a shell of volume around the core that isn't assigned to any cell. Fixing this is just means tweaking the geometry until it matches the real thing, if this is based on a real thing.

I think at that point the leaks stopped. I had a source overflow that needed me to change the initial k guess, but I've messed with a lot of stuff in order to get it running on my system and to make things easily visible in mcplot. Btw, your control rod tube is very very narrow. I don't think I needed to do anything else to make it work.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes a1234 and berkeman
Thank you so much for the help, I was able to get it to work!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Back
Top