MCNPX - How calculate Kerma (kinetic energy released per unit mass) in Air?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Kerma (kinetic energy released per unit mass) in air using MCNPX, particularly in the context of simulating a mammography machine. Participants are exploring the challenges faced in obtaining accurate results and the appropriate methods for tallying energy deposition.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their project involving the calculation of mean glandular dose (MGD) from women with augmented breasts and expresses difficulties in calculating Kerma in air using MCNPX.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the type of radiation source and its distribution.
  • A request is made for sharing the MCNPX input file in ASCII format to better understand the setup.
  • Concerns are raised about the configuration of the "SDEF" card, suggesting it may not be appropriate for simulating a rectangular parallel beam.
  • One participant explains the conversion from MeV/g to Gy, emphasizing the need to normalize results to photon flux for accurate comparisons.
  • Another participant questions the validity of the low results obtained for Kerma and suggests multiplying by the number of histories to find the correct value.
  • Clarifications are provided regarding the interpretation of F6 results and the normalization process required for accurate Kerma calculations.
  • One participant shares their specific results, indicating that multiplying by the conversion factor yields unexpectedly low values for Gy.
  • Another participant reiterates the importance of knowing the flux of the X-rays emitted to calculate the final result in Gy/s.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the configuration of the simulation and the interpretation of results. There is no consensus on the correct approach to achieve accurate Kerma calculations, and multiple competing perspectives on the setup and normalization process remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential issues with the geometry setup and the normalization process, indicating that assumptions about the radiation source and its characteristics may affect the results. The discussion highlights the complexity of accurately simulating and calculating Kerma in air using MCNPX.

Alexander Camargo
Messages
37
Reaction score
10
Hi, my name is alexander, i am student from Institute of radioprotection and dosimetry (IRD). My project is calculate MGD (mean glandular dose) from womans with augmented breast. i am having dificulties to calculate Kerma in air with mcnpx. I drew a block of air above the breast, i am using the "tally" f6 (energy deposited in cell) for obtain the kerma in MeV/g. However, I'm not obtained good results, i obtain very low values.

I ask for help for ideas or suggestions.

thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What is the type of radiation source, and what is its distribution?
 
Hi,
Can you put your file (in ascii) ?
 
mcnpx 2.7

Code:
C Alexander Camargo - 23/10/2018
C *******************Celulas********************************
10 2 -1.090 (-1 2 -3 4) #20 imp:p=1 VOL=149.2256511   $ espessura / thickness                     
20 1 -0.9850 (-5 6 -7 8) imp:p=1 VOL=353.4291735           $ mama / breast 
30 3 -0.001205 (-10 -11 12 13) #10 #20 imp:p=1 VOL=10.3059947 $ ar / air
C ----- Acompanhamento -----
80 3 -0.001205 (-80) #10 #20 #30 imp:p=1                   $ Mundo-Interno / universe
90 0 (80) imp:p=0                                          $ Fim do Acompanhamento

C -------------Geometrias / geometries ----------------
C ------------ espessura / thickness ----------
1 cz 8
2 pz -2.5
3 pz 2.5
4 px 0
C ------------ mama / breast -------------
5 cz 7.5
6 pz -2
7 pz 2
8 px 0.5
C ------------ AR / air -------------
10 cz 8.1
11 pz 2.6
12 pz 2.5
13 px 0
C --- Fim de Acompanhamento / universe ---
80 SO 225 $ Mundo

C area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.5312 0 0 0
mode P $ fotons / photons
C -------------- fonte e energia (monoenergetico) ----------------
sc1  raio x monoenergetico para mamografia                               
SDEF X=d1 Y=d2 Z=60 PAR=2 ERG=0.018 VEC=0 0 1 DIR=-1
SI1 -1 9 $ sampling range Xmin to Xmax
SP1 0 1 $ weighting for x sampling: here constant
SI2 -10 10 $ sampling range Ymin to Ymax
SP2 0 1 $ weighting for y sampling: here constant
C                                                           
C **************************** Materiais *********************************                               
C ***************************** mama padrao 50/50 **********************************   
m1    1000          -0.1140  $ H
      6000          -0.5250  $ C
      7000          -0.0060 $ N
      8000          -0.3535 $ O
      11000         -0.0005  $ Na
      16000         -0.0005 $ S
      17000         -0.0005  $ Cl
C                                                                           
C ------------------------ Pele -------------------------------
m2    1000          -0.100  $ H
      6000          -0.199  $ C
      7000          -0.042 $ N
      8000          -0.650 $ O
      11000         -0.002  $ Na
      15000         -0.001  $ P
      16000         -0.002 $ S
      17000         -0.003  $ Cl
      19000         -0.001 $ K
C
C ****************************** AR ***************************************     
m3    6000           -0.000124   $ C
      7000           -0.755268   $ N
      8000           -0.231781   $ O
      18000          -0.012827   $ Ar
C
C ************************** Tungstenio *********************************
C m4    74000          -1.000
C
C *************************************************************************
C
C                               
C ***************************** Tallies ***********************************
f4:p 30
f6:p 30
c
C
C
C
C *************************** tempo de Input **********************************     
NPS   16000000   $ Stop after XX source particles have been run.               
C CTME 120          $ Stop run after XX minutes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't see a trivial error.
I suppose you have multiplied F6 by 1.602e-10 to convert in Gy. Remember that to compare results, you have to normalize to the fluence (K/phi) to obtain Gy.cm2.

Note that for me the "SDEF" is Strange. If you want a rectangular parallel beam you must write something like that "SDEF X=d1 Y=d2 Z=0 pos 0 0 60 …" but in fact I don't know what you want to simulate ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
upload_2018-10-24_12-36-30.png


i need to kerma in air, but, i found very low results. I need multiplicate my results per 16000000 to found the valor?

I want simulate a mamography machine with focal point the 60cm the breast. My card "SDEF" is configured for a one-dimensional collimated beam in direction the -z axis.

sorry for my lack of knowledge, I'm new to the mcnpx area and I'm in the third year of graduation.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-24_12-36-30.png
    upload_2018-10-24_12-36-30.png
    30.7 KB · Views: 679
Hi,
No ! A F6 result is in MeV/g for one photon emitted
If you want in Gy you have (F6)*1E6 (eV/g)*1E3 (eV/kg)*1.602E-19 (J/kg=Gy)=F6*1.602e-10 in Gy
But you must remember that MCNP normalizes the results to one photon. So you must multiplied by the photon flux (photon/s) to have a result in Gy/s.

For geometry I am not sure to understand. Do you want to simulate a beam like this :

upload_2018-10-24_21-4-17.png

and

upload_2018-10-24_21-5-38.png


Furthermore a mamography device not emitted a monocinetic energy of photon. For example :
c00069_f069-001-9780702042959.jpg


In first approximation a photon of 18 keV like in your simulation could be ok.
Hope it's help
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-24_21-4-17.png
    upload_2018-10-24_21-4-17.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 670
  • upload_2018-10-24_21-5-38.png
    upload_2018-10-24_21-5-38.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 680
  • c00069_f069-001-9780702042959.jpg
    c00069_f069-001-9780702042959.jpg
    10.7 KB · Views: 791
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot.

I understood everything your said, but, when I multiply my results in mev / g by 1.602E-10, I get very low results for what I want.

In cell 30 (semi-circular cylinder of air. to obtain kerma in air) i obtained = 6.01751E-05 (mev/g per history). multiplyed by 1,602E-10 i obtain 9,64E-15 (Gy por history).

my fluence obtained in cell 30 is 4.41740E-03 (1/cm**2)

I simulate one million histories. 4.867E+06 histories/minute.

please, help me in this question.
 
Your result is 9.64E-15 Gy for one Xrays emitted by your device.
You must known the flux of your device in Xrays/s and multiplied the flux by your results and you have Gy/s
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K