Mean energy and preassure inolving partition function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the mean energy and pressure of a gas using the partition function in statistical mechanics. The mean energy is expressed as \(\overline{U} = -\frac{1}{z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \beta}\), where \(z\) is the partition function defined as \(z = \sum_{r} e^{-\beta E_{r}}\). The Boltzmann probability distribution is utilized, with \(p_{r} = \frac{e^{-\beta E_{r}}}{z}\), to derive the average energy through differentiation with respect to \(\beta\). The participants clarify the mathematical steps involved in these derivations, emphasizing the relationship between the partition function and average energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts, particularly the canonical ensemble.
  • Familiarity with the partition function and its mathematical formulation.
  • Knowledge of Boltzmann's probability distribution and its application in thermodynamics.
  • Basic calculus skills, especially differentiation with respect to parameters.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the canonical partition function in detail.
  • Learn about the relationship between thermodynamic quantities and statistical mechanics.
  • Explore applications of the partition function in different thermodynamic systems.
  • Investigate the implications of mean energy and pressure in real gases versus ideal gases.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and anyone involved in research related to gas behavior and energy calculations.

rayman123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We had a lecture about partition function, canonical ensemble etc.
Can someone explain to me how this work out this formula


Homework Equations


we are supposed to find the mean energy and preasure of a gas with given partition function



The Attempt at a Solution


mean energy is given [tex]\overline{-}U=\sum_{r}E_{r}p_{r}[/tex]
I know also that Boltzmann's probability distribution is described by
[tex]p_{r}= \frac{e^{-\beta E_{r}}}{\sum_{r}e^{-\beta E_{r}}}[/tex]

because the partition function is definied as [tex]z=\sum_{r}e^{-\beta E_{r}^}[/tex]


so rewriting now the Boltzmann's probablility distribution I get
[tex]p_{r}= \frac{e^{-\beta E_{r}}}{z}[/tex]

Homework Statement



now going back to the mean energy I can write
[tex]\overline{-}U=\frac{1}{z}\sum_{r}E_{r}e^{-\beta E_{r}[/tex]

These are operations I do not understand. Could someone explain them step by step ?

[tex]\sum_{r}E_{r}e^{-\beta E_{r}}= -\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta}\sum_{r}e^{-\beta E_{r}}= -\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta}z[/tex]

and the final one

[tex]U= -\frac{1}{z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \beta}=-\frac{\partial lnz}{\partial \beta}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rayman123 said:
These are operations I do not understand. Could someone explain them step by step ?
[tex]\sum_{r}E_{r}e^{-\beta E_{r}}= -\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta}\sum_{r}e^{-\beta E_{r}}= -\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta}z[/tex]
The first part of the equation is how you find the (ensemble) average energy---you find the weighted average over all ensemble states. The second part is showing that you can rewrite this as the partial derivative with respect to beta; if you take the derivative of the Boltzmann factor WRT beta, the energy E gets pulled down
[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta}e^{-\beta E_{r}}= E_{r} e^{-\beta E_{r}}[/tex]
In the expression using the partial derivative wrt beta, the sum over Boltzmann factors is the definition of the partition function. So you end up with the partial derivative of the partition function = the average energy.

rayman123 said:
and the final one
[tex]U= -\frac{1}{z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial \beta}=-\frac{\partial lnz}{\partial \beta}[/tex]
Again, this is just rewriting things with derivatives. Using the chain rule, if you take the derivative of lnz, you get a 1/z term out front.

'z' is some function of beta [tex]z = z(\beta)[/tex], so using the chain rule: [tex]\frac{\partial ln z(\beta)}{\partial \beta} = \frac{1}{z} \frac{\partial z(\beta)}{\partial \beta}[/tex]

Does that make sense?
 
Last edited:
yes it does!:) thank you
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K