Mean motion of Halleys Comet (question about units)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mean motion of Halley's Comet using the formula n = √(GM/a³), where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the Sun, and a is the semi-major axis. The original poster is uncertain about the appropriate units for a and the resulting units for n.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the units for the semi-major axis and the resulting units for mean motion, expressing confusion over the output of the formula. Other participants discuss the dimensional analysis of the formula and suggest that n should yield units of s-1.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of the units derived from the formula and discussing the meaning of the calculated value of n. There is an ongoing inquiry into the interpretation of mean motion and its representation in different units.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions their background in mathematics, indicating a potential gap in understanding physical units. There is also a reference to using the formula in Kepler's equation, suggesting a connection to orbital mechanics.

Deadstar
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to find out the mean motion of Halleys Comet using the equation.

[tex]n = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{a^3}}[/tex]

where we have taken the mass of Halleys comet to be negligible compared to the sun, M is the mass of the sun and a is the semi major axis.

The Attempt at a Solution




My question is what unit do I take a to be (i.e AU? m?). Nothing seems to give me an answer that makes sense.

And what units should n actually have? I seem to think it should be in revolutions per day but I'm not quite sure what the above formula is actually giving me. It would seem to be [tex]ms^{-1}[/tex] (or square root of, whatever that means...) if we take a in meters but then I get an answer of around [tex]2.6^10^{-9}[/tex] which is clearly wrong!

P.S. I'm a mathematician which is why I have zero grasp of units...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Deadstar! :smile:

If you put SI units in, you always get SI units out.

As you know, GMm/r2 is a force, ie mass times acceleration, and so has dimensions of ML/T2

So G has dimensions of L3/MT2,

and so √(GM/a3) has dimensions of 1/T, and will have units of s-1. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Deadstar! :smile:

If you put SI units in, you always get SI units out.

As you know, GMm/r2 is a force, ie mass times acceleration, and so has dimensions of ML/T2

So G has dimensions of L3/MT2,

and so √(GM/a3) has dimensions of 1/T, and will have units of s-1. :wink:

Thanks tiny-tim.

This is actually what I got as well (not sure where that ms^-1 came from, might have been a mistype...) from using a different formula to derive the units.

So, I'm now getting 2.6x10^(-9) as my answer.

What is this telling me exactly? The change in angle per second? I can't seem to find any info on mean motion except the very small wikipedia link.
 
Hi Deadstar! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

I'm guessing it's either radians per second or revolutions per second.

I've not seen the formula before … where did you get it from?
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Deadstar! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

I'm guessing it's either radians per second or revolutions per second.

I've not seen the formula before … where did you get it from?


Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_motion

Although note that, M + m was taken to be just M as the comets mass was negligible compared to the sun.
 
I should also say that I will then be using the formula in Keplers equation.

[tex]n(t-\tau) = E - e \sin(E)[/tex]

Where [tex]\tau[/tex] is the time of pericentre passage
E is the eccentric anomaly
e is the eccentricity

I'm trying to find E given some time t which I have.
 
Well, it says it's the "angular rate", ie radians per second, but it gives no references, and I have no idea whether that's correct. :redface:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K